Arshad Sharif murder case referred to committee for larger bench
Justice Mansoor observed that this three-member bench could not hear arguments on merits of case
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday referred a suo motu case regarding slain journalist Arshad Sharif, who had been assassinated in Kenya, to a three-member committee for constituting a larger bench.
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and comprising Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan heard the suo motu case regarding independent and transparent investigation into the murder of Arshad Sharif.
During the hearing, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah observed that the case was earlier heard by a five-member bench, adding that it seemed the matter had been fixed before this bench by a mistake.
He said that this matter also did not come before a three-member committee, constituted under the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023, that decide about the constitution of a bench for hearing a suo motu case.
Attorney General Mansoor Usman told the court that a draft for Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) has been prepared and soon it will be approved by the cabinet in its upcoming meeting. To a question, the AG informed the court that the Kenyan court has also announced its decision in the matter in hand.
Justice Mansoor observed that this three-member bench could not hear the arguments on the merits of the case.
Advocate Shaukat Siddiqui, representing the family members of the slain journalist, informed the court that earlier they had submitted an application before the larger bench and had requested for summoning those people who claim that they have the knowledge as to who killed Arshad Sharif.
Siddiqui further submitted that they had also placed in the application names of those six persons who knew who were involved in killing of Arshad Sharif. He submitted that the larger bench had dismissed the application for not being maintainable.
Justice Mansoor observed that the matter was very important and should be heard at length but added that as the matter has been heard earlier by a five-member larger bench, therefore, it would be appropriate that it should be referred to the committee for fixing the larger bench to hear the case.
It is pertinent to mention here that former Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial had taken suo motu notice of murder of journalist Arshad Sharif and later on a five-member bench of the apex court headed by him had heard the case.
-
Prince Harry Told Tax Payer Security Is ‘fair Pay’ -
'Avatar: Fire And Ash' Hit Online After James Cameron Weighed In On Franchise Future -
Florence Pugh, Boyfriend Finn Cole Get Official On Social Media -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Icing Out Is ‘not Civil,’ Says Expert -
Queen Elizabeth II Believed Shamed Andrew ‘did Not Behave Improperly’ -
'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' Vs 'The Super Mario Bros.' Movie': Which One Is Better? -
Tiger Woods Breaks Silence After DUI Arrest: 'I Am Stepping Away' -
Kristi Noem Hit By Husband Bryon's Cross-dressing Photos After Corey Lewandowski 'affair' -
Jamie Lee Curtis Reveals Why She Never Planned To Become An Actress -
Protest Announced Against King Charles In Wales -
Dan Levy Says He Wanted ‘dust To Settle’ After Schitt’s Creek -
The Verdict Is Out On Prince William's Gesture Towards Warwick Davis -
Princess Beatrice Drowning In Family ‘turmoil’ Over Epstein Files -
James McAvoy Secretly Welcomes Second Baby? -
Charlie Kirk Killing: Bullet Match Confusion Explained -
Prince William ‘frustrated’ Staff With ‘transitional Year’