Sovereignty strategies

This refers to the article, ‘The many faces of Pakistani sovereignty’ (May 27) by Ayaz Amir. We can do far more for the Afghan nation by ushering in a peaceful era for them which would undoubtedly be followed by doling out generous funds for its redevelopment by its surrounding neighbours in the years ahead. Or, we can do far less for the Afghan nation by continuing to prop up the so-called Afghan Taliban or the Quetta Shura in order to serve our silly, inflated ego and the notions of ‘strategic depth’ – a concept that died in 1998 when we became a nuclear power.

After discussing the Afghan imbroglio in-depth, the writer states that our ruling elite is ‘corrupt to the bone’ – which is a fact. Our ruling coterie needs to be taught ethics, morality and the virtue of ‘think Pakistan first’. Those who actually hold sway in our country need to re-examine all facets of our foreign policy. And quickly, before India surpasses us in every field of human activity in the next 50 odd years.

Abbas R Siddiqi

Lahore

*****

The writer has rightly criticised the government and the military for their failures at the national and international levels. While referring to the killing of Mullah Akhtar Mansour, he has blamed the interior minister for his poor handling of security issues by citing a few examples and consequences of his love for the outlawed TTP. Though the writer’s arguments carry weight, the good work done by the minister should also be appreciated. Instead of suggesting a way out to protect our sovereignty, the writer has termed the protest lodged with the US comical. That is not fair.

Do we have any other option? Can we take on superpowers for violating our sovereignty? The writer should have given some concrete suggestions to protect our sovereignty instead of making fun with the same old rhetoric.

Lt Col (r) Mukhtar Ahmed Butt

Karachi