FBR mulls appeal against SHC’s stay on super tax
KARACHI: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has planned to challenge the Sindh High Court’s order to stop collection of one-time super tax from the big corporate on an appeal filed by a local brokerage as the stay strangled the revenue body’s effort to meet its target, a senior official said on Monday.
“A leading brokerage house in Karachi approached the Sindh High Court (SHC) challenging the levy for it being unconstitutional and discriminatory in nature,” an official informed The News.
In November 2015, the SHC stayed the recovery of the super tax imposed for the tax year 2015 for the rehabilitation of temporary displaced persons on companies having an annual income of Rs500 million or above. The tax rate is four percent on income of banking companies and three percent on other taxpayers.
The revenue body had estimated a collection of Rs22 billion from the levy. The cost of rehabilitation of displaced persons and security enhancement was estimated at more than Rs180 billion.
The official said since the court had stayed the proceedings, the Inland Revenue authorities of the FBR were largely unable to recover the amount according to the estimates.
The official said the stay granted by the high court would not automatically expire after six months as the court ruled that the tax authorities would have to get it vacated through a counter petition.
Sources said once the stay was vacated, the FBR would recover the amount of the super tax as well as surcharge. The deadline for filing the corporate returns for the tax year 2015 already expired on January 21.
The government is already in the Supreme Court defending the levy as legitimate and constitutional against Younus Textiles Mills, Faysal Bank and IGI Insurance Company, which challenged the super tax.
The sources said the FBR collected a nominal amount under this head, but most of the eligible taxpayers are reluctant to pay the levy because of the stay granted by the high court.
There are scores of companies/taxpayers, having annual income of Rs500 million or above, and unless the court decides the matter, authorities could not proceed with the recovery. An official said billions of rupees were stuck due to the litigation.
-
Rihanna 38th Birthday Detail Breaks The Internet, Featuring Unexpected Huge Item -
Liza Minnelli Recalls Rare Backstage Memory With Mum Judy Garland In New Memoir -
Armed Intruder Shot Dead At Trump's Mar-a-Lago Residence: US Secret Service -
Total Lunar Eclipse: What You Need To Know And Where To Watch -
Timothee Chalamet Admits To Being Inspired By Matthew McConaughey's Performance In 'Interstellar' -
'Determined' Savannah Guthrie Plans To Honour Her Mother Nancy With Major Move: 'It's Going To Be Emotional' -
Train's Pat Monahan Blows The Lid On 'emotional' Tale Attached To Hit Song 'Drops Of Jupiter' -
Kurt Russell Spills The Beans On His Plans For Milestone Birthday This Year: 'Looking Forward To It' -
PayPal Data Breach Exposed Sensitive User Data For Six-month Period; What You Need To Know -
Prince William Receives First Heartbreaking News After Andrew Arrest -
11-year-old Allegedly Kills Father Over Confiscated Nintendo Switch -
Jacob Elordi Talks About Filming Steamy Scenes With Margot Robbie In 'Wuthering Heights' -
Why Prince Harry Really Wants To Reconcile With King Charles, Prince William, Kate Middleton? -
'Grief Is Cruel': Kelly Osbourne Offers Glimpse Into Hidden Pain Over Rockstar Father Ozzy Death -
Timothée Chalamet Reveals Rare Impact Of Not Attending Acting School On Career -
Liza Minnelli Gets Candid About Her Struggles With Substance Abuse Post Death Of Mum Judy Garland