close
Monday May 23, 2022

Wealth tax

January 29, 2022

Our politicians, flush from millionaire/billionaire campaign ‘contributions,’ like to pretend that the cost of dealing with the climate and biodiversity crises is prohibitively expensive and pretend that we should wait until the cost of solutions come down before we act, but is this really true?

In their 2019 Emissions Gap Report, the UN states that transitioning to a zero-carbon economy by 2050 will cost between $1.6 and $3.8 trillion annually. While this is an enormous amount of money, to put it into context, $16.7 trillion was spent globally by May 2021 on Covid-19 measures. It is also worth noting that should global temperatures warm by 2 degrees Celsius, then the cost to the global economy is estimated at between $10 and $20 trillion a year, a fivefold increase. The cost of action will rise each year governments drag their feet. It will never be cheaper than $1.6-$3.8 trillion.

Now we have seen what it will cost, the big question should be where this funding comes from? One source of funding could come from military budgets which total approximately $2 trillion a year and contribute around 6 percent of global CO2 emissions. As military budgets are sold to citizens as a defense strategy, their use to defend us from runaway climate chaos is clearly warranted. A further source of funding, and one that is equally justified, is a global wealth tax on millionaires and billionaires. Why is this justified? Well, research is clear that emissions are closely correlated with wealth, and as we live in a world where we are taught to be responsible for our actions, it seems fair that the more you have contributed to the problem, the more you should pay to solve it.

Research by Oxfam and the Stockholm Environment Institute found that the richest 10 percent (over $38,000) were responsible for 49 percent of emissions, the richest 5 percent contributed 37 percent of emissions while the wealthiest 1 percent (over $109,000) created around 15 percent.

The poorest 50 percent of humanity contributed almost nothing. This should be enough evidence to refute the often-cited words that ‘population is the problem’. If the top half of earners lived like the bottom 50 percent then global emissions would be just 14 percent of their current total and could be balanced through natural carbon sequestration.

Now that we understand the cost of solving the crisis, and we know that the wealthier you are, the more you have contributed to the planetary crisis unfolding, could we now work out how much the wealthy need to pay in order to fund a transition to a zero-carbon economy? A 2022 report from OXFAM, Patriotic Millionaires, the Institute for Policy Studies and Fight Inequality has done just that.

They calculate that there are 3.6 million citizens with more than $5 million in the bank, 183,000 citizens with more $50 million and there are 2,660 billionaires. According to their findings, if we were to tax these global citizens at 2, 3 and 5 percent respectively we could raise $2.52 trillion.

Excerpted: ‘It’s Time for a Global Billionaire and Millionaire Wealth Tax to Save Our Living Planet’

Comments