IRS seminar: Sino-Indian border clashes outcome of Indo-US strategic partnership
Islamabad: Former diplomat Shahid Masroor Gul Kiani has linked the Sino-Indian border clashes in Ladakh to the compulsions of the Indo-US strategic partnership aimed at containing China.
Kiani was speaking at an event organised here by the Institute of Regional Studies (IRS). Kiani argued that the Modi government got unnecessarily carried away by its alliance with the US which, according to him, had laid to rest any claims of India with regard to its non-alignment. He was of the view that the China-India standoff in Galwan signified the importance of border demarcations in the region which was not realised even by seasoned Indian politicians like Jawaharlal Nehru.
He opined that Chinese premier Zhou Enlai had proposed to India to let China keep Aksai Chin in exchange for China accepting Indian control of the southern slopes of the Himalayas in April 1962.
The proposition, according to Kiani, was rejected by Nehru and the 1962 Sino-Indian war took place in October the same year. To the contrary, Kiani maintained that Pakistan exhibited wisdom when it entered into a border agreement with China in March 1962 to avoid any misunderstanding between the two brotherly neighbouring countries.
He stated that while the Chinese were very clear on the demarcation of the 3,440 km-long border with India, it was the Indian leadership that was confused about it. He added that the clashes between the Chinese and Indian forces in March 2020 were the result of a build-up of tensions between the two states since May 2019 when the Chinese objected to Indian construction on the Chinese side of the border without informing the Chinese. He opined that diplomatic protocol demanded that activity along the un-demarcated border should have been notified to the Chinese side but since India had ulterior motives it clandestinely conducted construction activities with a mala fide intention.
He also linked the Sino-Indian border clashes of 2020 in Galwan to the Indian actions in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, especially the revocation of the special status of Kashmir.
He was of the opinion that Indian military build-up along the un-demarcated border with China was part of the Indian consolidation of its illegal occupation of IIOJK that includes Ladakh.
-
Maxwell Seeks To Block Further Release Of Epstein Files, Calls Law ‘unconstitutional’ -
Prince William Issues 'ultimatum' To Queen Camilla As Monarchy Is In 'delicate Phase' -
Winter Olympics 2026: Remembering The Most Unforgettable, Heartwarming Stories -
King Charles Hands All Of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Records And Files To Police: Report -
Eric Dane's Family Shares Heartbreaking Statement After His Death -
Samsung Brings Perplexity AI To Galaxy S26 With ‘Hey Plex’ Voice Command -
Fergie’s Spent £13,000 A Day Since Andrew’s Troubles Started: Here’s Where She Fled -
Eric Dane's Death Becomes Symbol Of ALS Awareness -
Michael B. Jordan Gives Credit To 'All My Children' For Shaping His Career: 'That Was My Education' -
Sun Appears Spotless For First Time In Four Years, Scientists Report -
Bella Hadid Opens Up About 'invisible Illness' -
Lawyer Of Epstein Victims Speaks Out Directly To King Charles, Prince William, Kate Middleton -
Microsoft CEO Shares How Gates Doubted $1bn OpenAI Investment -
Milo Ventimiglia Calls Fatherhood 'pretty Wild Experience' As He Expects Second Baby With Wife Jarah Mariano -
Chinese Scientists Unveil Advanced AI Model To Support Deep-space Exploration -
Anthropic’s New AI Tool Wipes Billions Off Cybersecurity Stocks