Minimum wage of Rs25,000 challenged in SHC
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday has issued notices to secretary labour and human resource department, and secretary minimum wage board on petition of employers that challenged the fixation of minimum monthly wage of Rs25,000 for unskilled workers by Sindh government.
The Employers Federation of Pakistan (EFP), and others had submitted a petition alleging Sindh government to score political mileage, announced an increase in minimum wage of the unskilled workers from Rs17,500 to Rs25,000 per month without even initiating statutory requirements as contained in the Sindh Minimum Wages Act.
They informed the court that they had earlier raised objections against the recommendations of the Sindh Minimum Wages Board on various legal and factual grounds but they were not invited in the board meeting to decide the minimum wage.
The petitioners said the EFP, however, after consultation with the members informed the government that they were agreed to increase minimum wage from Rs17,500 to Rs19,000 per month. But instead of considering the employers’ offer, Sindh government had issued an impugned notification by fixing the minimum wage of Rs25,000 per month for unskilled workers, while secretary labour did not send proposal to fix minimum wage of Rs25,000 to the board. They submitted that as many as 43 percent increase in minimum wage was irrational and without any legal consideration, which would have consequential effect in terms of variable cost on account of allowances, leave bonuses and gratuity etc.
The EFP and others pleaded the court that besides increasing minimum wage of unskilled workers, it would also invoke proportionate increase in the wages of other workers’ categories that might disrupt the entire compensation structure.
They said it would adversely impact even amounting to closure of business, submitting that the minimum wage in other provinces has been fixed Rs20,000 per month from July 1 and the fixation of Rs25,000 in Sindh would place the petitioners in most uncompetitive and disadvantageous position.
The petitioners pleaded the court to declare the impugned notification as unlawful and requested to suspend the implementation of notification till the decision of the petition. The SHC has issued notices to the secretary labour, minimum wage board and advocate general, directed them to submit their comments on August 6.
-
Ariana Grande Opens Up About ‘dark’ PTSD Experience -
Angelina Jolie Says It Loud: 'Scars Define My Life' -
Climate-driven Wildfires Scorch Some Of World’s Oldest Trees In Patagonia -
King Charles’ Ignorance Over Andrew & Jeffrey Epstein Not True? Foreign Office, MI6’s Work Comes Out -
Police Detained 'innocent' Man In Nancy Guthrie's Kidnapping -
Co-founders Of Elon Musk's XAI Resigned: Here's Why -
Dakota Johnson Reveals Smoking Habits, The Leading Cause Of Lung Cancer -
FAA Shuts Down El Paso Airport, Flights Suspended For 10 Days: Here’s Why -
Kate Middleton, Prince William's Major Plan Revealed After Statement On Andrew Scandal -
Teacher Abused Children Worldwide For 55 Years, Kept USB Log Of Assaults -
Nick Jonas Set To Showcase Acting Skills In Upcoming Thriller 'Bodyman' -
Milano-Cortina 2026: Assessing Italy’s Winter Olympics Economic Growth -
Chris, Liam Hemsworth Support Their Father Post Alzheimer’s Diagnosis -
Savannah Guthrie Expresses Fresh Hope As Person Detained For Questioning Over Kidnapping Of Nancy -
ByteDance Suspends Viral Seedance 2.0 Photo-to-voice Feature: Here’s Why -
Tom Hanks Diabetes 2 Management Strategy Laid Bare