PHC adjourns hearing in petitions against Reforms Act
By our correspondents
December 04, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) adjourned the hearing into the writ petitions against the Medical Teaching Institution Reforms Act 2015 in the teaching hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
-
Jake Paul Criticizes Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Show: 'Fake American' -
Prince William Wants Uncle Andrew In Front Of Police: What To Expect Of Future King -
Antioxidants Found To Be Protective Agents Against Cognitive Decline -
Hong Kong Court Sentences Media Tycoon Jimmy Lai To 20-years: Full List Of Charges Explained -
Coffee Reduces Cancer Risk, Research Suggests -
Katie Price Defends Marriage To Lee Andrews After Receiving Multiple Warnings -
Seahawks Super Bowl Victory Parade 2026: Schedule, Route & Seattle Celebration Plans -
Keto Diet Emerges As Key To Alzheimer's Cure -
Chris Brown Reacts To Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Performance -
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship