PHC adjourns hearing in petitions against Reforms Act
By our correspondents
December 04, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) adjourned the hearing into the writ petitions against the Medical Teaching Institution Reforms Act 2015 in the teaching hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
-
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein -
Miranda Kerr Shares The One Wellness Practice She Does With Her Kids -
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15 -
Khloe Kardashian Shares How She And Her Sisters Handle Money Between Themselves -
Prince William Ready To End 'shielding' Of ‘disgraced’ Andrew Amid Epstein Scandal -
Chris Hemsworth Hailed By Halle Berry For Sweet Gesture -
Blac Chyna Reveals Her New Approach To Love, Healing After Recent Heartbreak -
Royal Family's Approach To Deal With Andrew Finally Revealed