Nankana UC results stayed
LAHOREThe Lahore High Court Monday stayed final result of local government election held in a Union Council-51 of Nankana Sahib where women voters were not allowed to cast their vote. Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan passed the order on a petition of a woman voter, Rukhsana Abbas, and also sought
By our correspondents
November 24, 2015
LAHORE
The Lahore High Court Monday stayed final result of local government election held in a Union Council-51 of Nankana Sahib where women voters were not allowed to cast their vote.
Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan passed the order on a petition of a woman voter, Rukhsana Abbas, and also sought a reply from chief election commissioner of Punjab. Petitioner’s counsel told the court that there were 296 women voters in Ward-I of UC-51 of Nankana Sahib. However, he said, during the second phase of LG polls, the women were not allowed to cast their votes. He alleged that the candidates of the UC restricted the women of the constituency from participating in the polling.
Justice Khan took strong notice of the happening and observed that citizens could not be deprived of his/her right to express. The judge lamented that the people were being pushed to stone-age even in 21st century. The judge restrained the ECP from notifying returned candidates of the constituency and sought a detailed report on the matter.
The Lahore High Court Monday stayed final result of local government election held in a Union Council-51 of Nankana Sahib where women voters were not allowed to cast their vote.
Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan passed the order on a petition of a woman voter, Rukhsana Abbas, and also sought a reply from chief election commissioner of Punjab. Petitioner’s counsel told the court that there were 296 women voters in Ward-I of UC-51 of Nankana Sahib. However, he said, during the second phase of LG polls, the women were not allowed to cast their votes. He alleged that the candidates of the UC restricted the women of the constituency from participating in the polling.
Justice Khan took strong notice of the happening and observed that citizens could not be deprived of his/her right to express. The judge lamented that the people were being pushed to stone-age even in 21st century. The judge restrained the ECP from notifying returned candidates of the constituency and sought a detailed report on the matter.
-
Jesy Nelson Reflects On Leaving Girls' Band Little Mix -
World’s First Pokemon Theme Park Opens In Tokyo, Boosts Japan Tourism -
Waymo Trains Robotaxis In Virtual Cities Using DeepMind’s Genie 3 -
5 Simple Rules To Follow For Smooth, Healthy Hair -
$44 Billion Bitcoin Blunder: Bithumb Exchange Apologizes For Accidental Payout -
Katie Price Ends Public Feud With Ex Peter Andre After 16 Years -
Apple May Bring ChatGPT And Other AI Apps To CarPlay -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Likely To Attend Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 -
AI Next Big Trial: Elon Musk Calls For ‘Galileo Test’ To Prove True Intelligence -
US Appeals Court Affirms Trump’s Immigration Detention Policy -
Bella Hadid, Adan Banuelos Rekindle Romance After Brief Separation -
Jay-Z Shares Bold Advice With Bad Bunny For NFL Super Bowl Halftime Show Appearance -
Epstein Probe: Bill, Hillary Clinton Call For Public Testimony Hearing -
Brooklyn Beckham Considers Adoption As Nicola Peltz Can't Carry A Baby -
Expert Discusses 'complications' Of Measles Outbreak -
Kaley Cuoco Recalls Her Divorce With Karl Cook: 'I Was Gonna Die'