ICC Afghan war crimes probe ‘must go ahead’
THE HAGUE: International war crimes judges ruled on Thursday that a probe into wartime abuses in Afghanistan must go ahead, including looking into possible atrocities committed by US forces, as they overturned a previous court ruling.
The call was immediately hailed by human rights organisations as a “pivotal moment” for victims of the central Asian country’s 18-year-war since the 2001 US invasion. But US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo attacked the International Criminal Court’s decision as a “reckless” move and “a truly breathtaking action by an unaccountable political institution masquerading as a legal body”.
Guissou Jahangiri, deputy president of the International Federation for Human Rights, called the ICC decision “a pivotal moment for victims in Afghanistan and beyond”. It sends “a much-needed signal to current and would-be perpetrators of atrocities that justice may one day catch up to them,” Human Rights Watch’s Param-Preet Singh added.
Pompeo, speaking at a news conference however said it was “all the more reckless for this ruling to come just days after the United States signed a historic peace deal on Afghanistan, which is the best chance for peace and a generation.”
Pre-trial judges at the ICC — an independent court set up in 2002 to try the world’s worst crimes — last year rejected a demand by its chief prosecutor to open a full-blown probe into crimes committed in the war-torn nation.
Prosecutors at The Hague appealed the move, saying that the judges made an error when they slapped down Fatou Bensouda’s request by saying although it met all the right criteria and a reasonable basis, it was “not in the interest of justice”. The appeals judges agreed with the prosecution. “The prosecutor is authorised to commence an investigation into alleged crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan since May 1, 2003,” ICC judge Piotr Hofmanski said. “It is for the prosecutor to determine whether there is a reasonable basis to initiate an investigation.”
Pre-trial judges are only called upon to see if there is a reasonable basis for an investigation and not to “review the prosecutor’s analysis”, he said. In fact, the appeals judges said, prosecutors could even look into possible atrocities outside of Afghanistan if they were clearly linked to its armed conflict.
ICC prosecutors previously said their investigation would include alleged war crimes by US Central Intelligence Agency operatives at detention facilities, referred to as “black sites” in ICC member countries like Lithuania, Poland and Romania.
-
Google Warns Of State-sponsored Cyberattacks Targeting Defense Sector Employees -
Ransom Deadline Passes: FBI Confirms ‘communication Blackout’ In Nancy Guthrie Abduction -
Jeff Bezos Hints At Blue Origin Moon Plans As Elon Musk Responds With Cautious Praise -
Zach Bryan Slams Turning Point USA Alternative Halftime Show: 'Embarrassing As Hell' -
South Korea Blames Coupang Data Breach On 'management Failures,' Not Cyber Attack -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew More Concerned About ‘issue Of His Legacy’ Than Epstein Links -
Instagram Plans New Snapchat-style App ‘Instants’ Amid Rising AR Competition -
Safer Internet Day 2026: Is Social Media Ban The Only Way To Protect Kids? -
Piers Morgan Finally Breaks Silence On Kidnapping Of Savannah Guthrie's Mother Nancy -
Lenore Taylor Resigns As Guardian Australia Editor After Decade-long Tenure -
'Mortified' Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Plan Interview To Finally Speak Truth In Sarah Ferguson, Andrew-Epstein Scandal -
Lewis Hamilton Spent Years Trying To Catch Kim Kardashian's Attention? -
Royal Strategy Revealed As King Charles, Prince William Issue Statements On Andrew Row -
Inside Will Smith's Struggle To Revive His Career After Infamous Oscar Incident -
What’s Coming Out Of Meghan Markle’s War Against Prince William? Inside People’s Unease -
Australia Seeks Urgent Meeting With Roblox Over 'Disturbing' Content Complaints