SECP forwards proposalsto Finance Ministry
ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has forwarded its recommendations on compulsory group insurance coverage, increase in the minimum sum cover amount and amendment in federal and provincial labour laws to the Finance Ministry. According to the recommendations, despite the fact that group insurance is
By Israr Khan
September 08, 2015
ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has forwarded its recommendations on compulsory group insurance coverage, increase in the minimum sum cover amount and amendment in federal and provincial labour laws to the Finance Ministry.
According to the recommendations, despite the fact that group insurance is legally mandatory, a significant part of the labour force remains uninsured because their employers do not procure group life insurance. As a result, the families of such uninsured employees remain financially vulnerable in case of death or disability of the breadwinner.
It is worth mentioning that through the 1968 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance, the compulsory group insurance had been made mandatory for permanent workmen, provided that the minimum number of employees in an industrial establishment is 50 and in a commercial establishment in 20.
The SECP pointed out that the minimum sum cover was last notified by the federal government in 2001 through the Labour Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2001, according to which the amount stands at Rs 200,000.
However, the minimum sum cover amount needs to be substantially raised. Furthermore, the provision of group insurance is required for only ‘permanent’ employees. The contract and temporary workers have been excluded from the scope of the compulsory group life insurance.
It has also been found out that the Section 10-B(4) of the 1968 ordinance makes the overall implementation of Section 10-B(1), (2) and (3) ineffective by requiring the employer to pay the prescribed benefits against death and injury to the heir of the workman if insurance has not been procured by the employer.
The penalty for non-compliance with the provisions of the 1968 ordinance is negligible, which has also lost value with the passage of time. The minimum sum cover for which each workman is to be insured is specified in Schedule IV to the 1923 Workmen Compensation Act as adopted by the provinces.
The SECP has recommended certain legal amendments to the federal and provincial labour laws. The recommendations seek to enhance the scope of coverage of group insurance, dynamise the minimum sum cover by linking it with a multiple of minimum wage, widen the applicability of compulsory group insurance and impose significant penalties for non-compliance.
The implementation of this scheme is also in line with the objectives of the National Financial Inclusion Strategy (NFIS) recently launched by the federal government, under which the government has committed to provide access to broad-based financial services, including insurance to those consumers which are currently excluded from the financial sector.
According to the recommendations, despite the fact that group insurance is legally mandatory, a significant part of the labour force remains uninsured because their employers do not procure group life insurance. As a result, the families of such uninsured employees remain financially vulnerable in case of death or disability of the breadwinner.
It is worth mentioning that through the 1968 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance, the compulsory group insurance had been made mandatory for permanent workmen, provided that the minimum number of employees in an industrial establishment is 50 and in a commercial establishment in 20.
The SECP pointed out that the minimum sum cover was last notified by the federal government in 2001 through the Labour Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2001, according to which the amount stands at Rs 200,000.
However, the minimum sum cover amount needs to be substantially raised. Furthermore, the provision of group insurance is required for only ‘permanent’ employees. The contract and temporary workers have been excluded from the scope of the compulsory group life insurance.
It has also been found out that the Section 10-B(4) of the 1968 ordinance makes the overall implementation of Section 10-B(1), (2) and (3) ineffective by requiring the employer to pay the prescribed benefits against death and injury to the heir of the workman if insurance has not been procured by the employer.
The penalty for non-compliance with the provisions of the 1968 ordinance is negligible, which has also lost value with the passage of time. The minimum sum cover for which each workman is to be insured is specified in Schedule IV to the 1923 Workmen Compensation Act as adopted by the provinces.
The SECP has recommended certain legal amendments to the federal and provincial labour laws. The recommendations seek to enhance the scope of coverage of group insurance, dynamise the minimum sum cover by linking it with a multiple of minimum wage, widen the applicability of compulsory group insurance and impose significant penalties for non-compliance.
The implementation of this scheme is also in line with the objectives of the National Financial Inclusion Strategy (NFIS) recently launched by the federal government, under which the government has committed to provide access to broad-based financial services, including insurance to those consumers which are currently excluded from the financial sector.
-
Meghan Markle Shows ‘real Pain’ With Her Body Language In Jordan -
Jennifer Garner Names Her Movie That She Hasn't Seen In Full Since Its Premiere -
Bridgerton’s Michelle Mao On Facing Backlash As Season Four Antagonist -
King Charles Gets New ‘secret Weapon’ After Andrew Messes Up -
Shia LaBeouf Makes Bold Claim About Homosexuals In First Interview After Mardi Gras Arrest -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie ‘strained’ As They Are ‘not Turning Back’ On Andrew -
Benny Blanco Addresses ‘dirty Feet’ Backlash After Podcast Moment Sparks Online Frenzy -
Sarah Ferguson Unusual Trait That Confused Royal Expert -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Left Sarah Ferguson Feeling 'worthless' -
Ben Affleck Focused On 'real Prize,' Stability After Jennifer Garner Speaks About Co Parenting Mechanics -
Luke Grimes Reveals Hilarious Reason His Baby Can't Stop Laughing At Him -
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two