close
Thursday March 28, 2024

SC restrains govt from selling Pak Steel land

By Sohail Khan
November 19, 2019

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday restrained the government from selling land owned by Pak Steel Mills and ruled that it is the property of the people of the country.

A two-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed heard the case pertaining to payment of provident fund to the former employees of Pak Steel. The court also dismissed as withdrawn, appeal by the federal government against the attachment of an account operated by the Ministry of Industries and Production.

During the hearing, Deputy Attorney General informed the court that they have to sell the land, as they did not have sufficient funds to pay provident funds to the employees. Justice Gulzar Ahmed, however, took strong exception to the performance of Pak Steel and observed that its output is zero, saying that instead of improving it, those responsible have destroyed it while concentrating on filling their pockets. Once it was a huge state-owned organization, which had facilitated functioning of hundreds of other steel mills but it has been ruined by the people responsible for it”, Justice Gulzar Ahmed recalled. He said cars, trucks and even rockets were prepared by the state-owned mills.

Meanwhile, the court restrained the government from selling the PSM land with the ruling that it belongs to the people of the country and adjourned the hearing for two weeks. The court also dismissed the appeal filed by the federal government against the attachment of an account operated by the Ministry of Industries and Production after the government withdrew the appeal. Deputy Attorney General informed the court that since the Sindh High Court had withdrawn its order, therefore, the appeal has become infructuous.

The Sindh High Court in August had ordered to freeze the accounts of the Federal Ministry of Industries and Production, which is the controlling authority and responsible for the management and operation of Pak Steel. The retired employees had moved the court against non-payment of gratuity and provident funds.