Pemra chief submits apology to IHC in contempt case
ISLAMABAD: The Chairman of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), Mirza Saleem Baig, submitted his unconditional apology to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in connection with a contempt of court case.
The high court resumed the hearing of the contempt notice issued to the Pemra chairman for using the court’s name without prior permission or context as means of persuasion to enforce strict guidelines on media houses and news anchors.
During the hearing, Mirza Saleem Baig submitted an unconditional apology to the high court and said that he could not even think of misusing court’s name and the notice was not issued to challenge the powers of the court. He prayed to the IHC for withdrawing show-cause notice over contempt of court issued on November 1.
The chairman also submitted a written reply to the court which stated that the authority had clarified its notification for not imposing restrictions on news anchors for joining other talk shows. The reply also stated that it had been clarified that news anchors were not restricted to participate in marathon transmission.
On October 29, the high court being presided over by Justice Athar Minallah had issued a contempt of court notice to the Pemra chairman for using the court’s name without prior permission. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) had issued new directives to all TV channels regarding analyses, views and discussion on sub-judice matters which resulted in tremendous backlash from a large segment of society, media and prominent political entities. Pemra had barred television anchors from giving their opinions during talk shows and limited their role to be moderators.
As per Pemra code of conduct, the role of anchors is to moderate the programmes in an objective, unbiased and impartial manner, excluding themselves from the personal opinions, biases and judgements on any issue. Therefore, anchors hosting regular shows should not appear in TV shows whether own or other channels as subject matter experts, it said in a statement on Sunday. The court sought a report of Pemra actions on such violations with a reprimand.
-
UK Releases Fresh Mandelson Files Amid Jeffrey Epstein Scandal Fallout -
Sarah Ferguson Risks Reopening The Darkest Chapter With King Charles: ‘He Have To Buy Her Out’ -
No Social Media For Under-16s: Malaysia Rolls Out New Age Restrictions -
AI Downtime Costs Surge As Automation Creates New Risks -
Nancy Guthrie Update: Ex-FBI Agent Spots Hidden Clues In Chilling Video -
Google To Release 32 Million Mosquitoes In Florida, California–Why Critics Are Concerned -
Queen Elizabeth's Legacy Falls Into Crisis: ‘They’ll Think She Protected Image Over Consequence’ -
220 Unicorn Startups Have Lost Their Billion-dollar Status. Here’s Why -
Halle Bailey Opens Up About 'motherhood' In Rare Personal Interview -
'Euphoria' Season 3 Pays Tribute To Angus Cloud -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Next Victim Comes Forward -
'Euphoria' Star Alexa Demie Breaks Silence On Retirement Rumours -
Crypto Exchange Giant Binance Enters US Stock, ETF Trading -
What New Glenn’s Explosion Means For NASA’s Next Moon Missions -
Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping Case: Legal Expert Warns One ‘piece Of Evidence’ Could Mislead Investigators -
UFO Spotted Behind Active Volcano? Harvard Professor Exposes Real Truth