Pemra chief submits apology to IHC in contempt case
ISLAMABAD: The Chairman of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), Mirza Saleem Baig, submitted his unconditional apology to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in connection with a contempt of court case.
The high court resumed the hearing of the contempt notice issued to the Pemra chairman for using the court’s name without prior permission or context as means of persuasion to enforce strict guidelines on media houses and news anchors.
During the hearing, Mirza Saleem Baig submitted an unconditional apology to the high court and said that he could not even think of misusing court’s name and the notice was not issued to challenge the powers of the court. He prayed to the IHC for withdrawing show-cause notice over contempt of court issued on November 1.
The chairman also submitted a written reply to the court which stated that the authority had clarified its notification for not imposing restrictions on news anchors for joining other talk shows. The reply also stated that it had been clarified that news anchors were not restricted to participate in marathon transmission.
On October 29, the high court being presided over by Justice Athar Minallah had issued a contempt of court notice to the Pemra chairman for using the court’s name without prior permission. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) had issued new directives to all TV channels regarding analyses, views and discussion on sub-judice matters which resulted in tremendous backlash from a large segment of society, media and prominent political entities. Pemra had barred television anchors from giving their opinions during talk shows and limited their role to be moderators.
As per Pemra code of conduct, the role of anchors is to moderate the programmes in an objective, unbiased and impartial manner, excluding themselves from the personal opinions, biases and judgements on any issue. Therefore, anchors hosting regular shows should not appear in TV shows whether own or other channels as subject matter experts, it said in a statement on Sunday. The court sought a report of Pemra actions on such violations with a reprimand.
-
Seedance 2.0: How It Redefines The Future Of AI Sector -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Still Has A Loan To Pay Back: Heres Everything To Know -
US House Passes ‘SAVE America Act’: Key Benefits, Risks & Voter Impact Explained -
'Heartbroken' Busy Philipps Mourns Death Of Her Friend James Van Der Beek -
Gwyneth Paltrow Discusses ‘bizarre’ Ways Of Dealing With Chronic Illness -
US House Passes Resolution To Rescind Trump’s Tariffs On Canada -
Reese Witherspoon Pays Tribute To James Van Der Beek After His Death -
Halsey Explains ‘bittersweet’ Endometriosis Diagnosis -
'Single' Zayn Malik Shares Whether He Wants More Kids -
James Van Der Beek’s Family Faces Crisis After His Death -
Courteney Cox Celebrates Jennifer Aniston’s 57th Birthday With ‘Friends’ Throwback -
Camila Cabello Shares Update On Her Hair Two Years After Going Platinum -
Prince William Steps In To Help Farmer's Awareness Mission -
Queen Elizabeth Tied To Andrew's Sexual Abuse Case Settlement: Report -
Mark Ruffalo Urges Fans To Boycott Top AI Company Boycott -
Prince William Joins Esports Battle In Saudi Arabia