Iran N-talks misses deadline
‘We’re frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock’
By our correspondents
July 08, 2015
Global powers seeking to hammer home a deal to curtail Iran’s suspect nuclear programme missed another deadline on Tuesday, with all sides vowing to now keep working until the end of the week.
“We are continuing to negotiate for the next couple of days,” EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini told reporters during a break from the negotiations in Vienna, effectively stopping the clock.
But the United States said the terms of a November 2013 interim accord under which Iran has been cutting back its stock of enriched uranium in return for sanctions relief would be extended until Friday, July 10, meaning this is the effective new deadline.
It was the fifth time since 2013 — and the second time in this round of talks — that the so-called P5+1 and Iran have missed their own target date to strike an unprecedented accord which has become bogged down over a number of weighty issues.
Mogherini admitted the seven nations at the negotiating table were “interpreting in a flexible way our deadline, which means that we are taking the time, the days we still need, to finalise the agreement”.
But she said it was still possible to overcome the remaining differences and reach a deal to draw a curtain on a 13-year standoff with Iran, first triggered when dissidents revealed its nuclear programme in 2002.
US Secretary of State John Kerry would remain in Vienna with Mogherini and their Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif, the US delegation spokeswoman Marie Harf said.
“We are taking these negotiations day to day to see if we can conclude a comprehensive agreement,” she said in a statement.
“We’ve made substantial progress in every area, but this work is highly technical and high stakes for all of the countries involved. We’re frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock,” Harf added.
After talking deep into the night on Monday, foreign ministers from the so-called P5+1 — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — met twice Tuesday without their Iranian counterparts.
They are seeking to hammer out a final accord to put an atomic bomb out of Iran’s reach in return for lifting a web of sanctions, after reaching a framework deal in April.
“We have no deadline,” a spokesman for the Iranian delegation told AFP.
For many observers July 9 had always been the real deadline, and the US team now has its back against the wall trying to nail down the final details by then.
If Kerry fails to hand over a deal by late Thursday, US lawmakers will get 60 days instead 30 to review and vote on it, which risks further complicating its implementation.
Despite progress on a series of complicated annexes, negotiations have hit hurdles on how to ease sanctions against Iran, probing allegations that in the past Tehran sought to develop nuclear arms, and ensuring Iran can continue to have a modest, peaceful nuclear programme.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov confirmed however that at the 11th hour a new problem had emerged — the lifting of a UN conventional arms embargo on Iran.
“I can assure you that there remains one major problem that’s related to sanctions: this is the problem of an arms embargo,” Lavrov told Interfax from Vienna.
Under the resolution, nations are banned from selling convention weapons such as tanks and missiles to Tehran. And Russia is believed to be eager to start selling such arms again.
An Iranian official revealed on Monday that Tehran was pushing for removal of any mention of a UN arms embargo in any final agreement.
“There is no evidence that the arms embargo has any relation with the nuclear issue,” the official said.
A fact sheet put out by the State Department as part of the April framework said that under the final deal there would be a new UN Security Council resolution to extend “important restrictions on conventional arms and ballistic missiles”.
Western officials are uneasy about allowing Iran to buy conventional weapons when it is accused of fomenting unrest in the Middle East, even though it is also fighting Islamic State militants, a common enemy for Washington and Tehran.
“We are continuing to negotiate for the next couple of days,” EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini told reporters during a break from the negotiations in Vienna, effectively stopping the clock.
But the United States said the terms of a November 2013 interim accord under which Iran has been cutting back its stock of enriched uranium in return for sanctions relief would be extended until Friday, July 10, meaning this is the effective new deadline.
It was the fifth time since 2013 — and the second time in this round of talks — that the so-called P5+1 and Iran have missed their own target date to strike an unprecedented accord which has become bogged down over a number of weighty issues.
Mogherini admitted the seven nations at the negotiating table were “interpreting in a flexible way our deadline, which means that we are taking the time, the days we still need, to finalise the agreement”.
But she said it was still possible to overcome the remaining differences and reach a deal to draw a curtain on a 13-year standoff with Iran, first triggered when dissidents revealed its nuclear programme in 2002.
US Secretary of State John Kerry would remain in Vienna with Mogherini and their Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif, the US delegation spokeswoman Marie Harf said.
“We are taking these negotiations day to day to see if we can conclude a comprehensive agreement,” she said in a statement.
“We’ve made substantial progress in every area, but this work is highly technical and high stakes for all of the countries involved. We’re frankly more concerned about the quality of the deal than we are about the clock,” Harf added.
After talking deep into the night on Monday, foreign ministers from the so-called P5+1 — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — met twice Tuesday without their Iranian counterparts.
They are seeking to hammer out a final accord to put an atomic bomb out of Iran’s reach in return for lifting a web of sanctions, after reaching a framework deal in April.
“We have no deadline,” a spokesman for the Iranian delegation told AFP.
For many observers July 9 had always been the real deadline, and the US team now has its back against the wall trying to nail down the final details by then.
If Kerry fails to hand over a deal by late Thursday, US lawmakers will get 60 days instead 30 to review and vote on it, which risks further complicating its implementation.
Despite progress on a series of complicated annexes, negotiations have hit hurdles on how to ease sanctions against Iran, probing allegations that in the past Tehran sought to develop nuclear arms, and ensuring Iran can continue to have a modest, peaceful nuclear programme.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov confirmed however that at the 11th hour a new problem had emerged — the lifting of a UN conventional arms embargo on Iran.
“I can assure you that there remains one major problem that’s related to sanctions: this is the problem of an arms embargo,” Lavrov told Interfax from Vienna.
Under the resolution, nations are banned from selling convention weapons such as tanks and missiles to Tehran. And Russia is believed to be eager to start selling such arms again.
An Iranian official revealed on Monday that Tehran was pushing for removal of any mention of a UN arms embargo in any final agreement.
“There is no evidence that the arms embargo has any relation with the nuclear issue,” the official said.
A fact sheet put out by the State Department as part of the April framework said that under the final deal there would be a new UN Security Council resolution to extend “important restrictions on conventional arms and ballistic missiles”.
Western officials are uneasy about allowing Iran to buy conventional weapons when it is accused of fomenting unrest in the Middle East, even though it is also fighting Islamic State militants, a common enemy for Washington and Tehran.
-
Bridgerton’s Michelle Mao On Facing Backlash As Season Four Antagonist -
King Charles Gets New ‘secret Weapon’ After Andrew Messes Up -
Shia LaBeouf Makes Bold Claim About Homosexuals In First Interview After Mardi Gras Arrest -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie ‘strained’ As They Are ‘not Turning Back’ On Andrew -
Benny Blanco Addresses ‘dirty Feet’ Backlash After Podcast Moment Sparks Online Frenzy -
Sarah Ferguson Unusual Trait That Confused Royal Expert -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Left Sarah Ferguson Feeling 'worthless' -
Ben Affleck Focused On 'real Prize,' Stability After Jennifer Garner Speaks About Co Parenting Mechanics -
Luke Grimes Reveals Hilarious Reason His Baby Can't Stop Laughing At Him -
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two -
Maggie Gyllenhaal Gets Honest About Being Jealous Of Jake Gyllenhaal -
'Bridgerton' Star Luke Thompson Gets Honest About Season Five