PHC stops subordinate court from trying defamation suit
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in
By our correspondents
June 27, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in the suit instead of recording evidence.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses.
On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses.
On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
-
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein