Criminal case against sugar mill on charges of tax fraud suspended
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has suspended a criminal case lodged by Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) against a sugar mill on charges of tax fraud amounting millions of rupees.
SW Sugar Mills through a writ petition challenged the FIR registered by Inland Revenue department of the FBR for being an act beyond its jurisdiction.
Defending the FIR, legal adviser for the department, Zainul Abideen, argued that the mill committed a huge tax fraud by suppressing the sales and actual stock of sugar. He said assessment of tax and completion of assessment proceedings were not pre-requisites for initiation of criminal action. He further said as per settled principles of law, civil and criminal proceedings could be initiated side by side and the impugned FIR was not liable to be quashed. Representing the mill, Advocate Ijaz Awan argued that the FIR had been lodged with ulterior motives by unlawfully converting civil proceedings into criminal.
He stated that in the absence of tax’s assessment under the Sales Tax Act 1990 and without knowingly the amount/loss involved in neither compound-ability was possible nor the award of sentence was justifiable in any manner. He said directly resorting to criminal proceedings was not the mandate of the sales tax act as mandatory pre-requisites had been blatantly ignored by the respondent before lodging the impugned FIR. The counsel pointed out that the issue in hand had already been settled by a two-judge bench of the high court in a 2014 judgment titled “Taj International verses FBR & others”. The instant petition should also be decided in light of that judgment, added the counsel. However, Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi observed that the judgment cited by the petitioner’s counsel was under challenge before the Supreme Court and the respondent/FBR had also not initiated any recovery proceedings by issuing show cause notice to the petitioner/mill.
The judge disposed of the petition ruling that the operation of the impugned FIR shall remain stayed till decision either by the Supreme Court or determination of due amount through adjudication process by the respondent department through show cause notice.
-
Do You Have Depression Or Is It Just Monday Blues? Find Out Where Science Stands -
Why Claude Is Gaining Momentum In Revolutionizing The AI Landscape -
Elon Musk Unveils Plans To Take Humanity To The Moon And Mars -
Air Pollution May Play A Role In Prostate Cancer Risk, Experts Warn -
Royal Expert Reveals Real Reason King Charles Won't Meet Prince Harry Next Week -
Ansel Elgort Welcomes His First Baby In Secret -
Startup Aims To Brighten Night Skies With Space Mirrors -
Cheaper Cars, Fewer EVs: Trump Administration Shifts ‘auto Policy’ Focus -
Meghan Markle Takes 'breadwinner' Role In Prince Harry's California Life -
Type 2 Diabetes Hidden Trigger In Daily Food Revealed -
Vertical Tabs Coming To Google Chrome -
Jane Seymour Reveals THIS Beloved Romance Was 'worst-reviewed' Movie Ever -
European Leaders Slam Trump’s Tariff Threat Over Greenland As ‘unacceptable’ -
Princess Eugenie Leaves Father Andrew 'devastated' With Big Step: 't's Brooklyn Beckham Level' -
Nova Scotia Snow Storm Warning Issued As Heavy Snow Moves In -
Vancouver Canucks 2025-26 Season: Adam Foote’s Future Under Early Scrutiny