Travel ban ends for Gitmo inmates swapped for Bergdahl
WASHINGTON: A one-year travel ban is expiring for five senior Taliban leaders held in US detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until they were released last year in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, raising the possibility that the five can move freely around the world as early as Monday. Under terms
By our correspondents
May 28, 2015
WASHINGTON: A one-year travel ban is expiring for five senior Taliban leaders held in US detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until they were released last year in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, raising the possibility that the five can move freely around the world as early as Monday.
Under terms of the exchange in May 2014, the five detainees were sent to Qatar where officials there agreed to monitor their activities and prevent them from travelling out of the country. In return, Bergdahl was released to the US military after being held captive by the Taliban for nearly five years after he walked away from his Army post in Afghanistan.
US officials have discussed with the Qataris the possibility of extending the travel ban after it expires on June 1. But so far, the White House has not publicly announced any new agreement with Qatar, meaning the five could leave the tiny nation on the Arabian Peninsula at the end of the month.
“In Congress, we spent a lot of time debating whether the Qataris were going to adequately keep an eye on them in the course of the 12 months,” said Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee. “My point all along was that I’m more worried about month No. 13 than the first 12.”
Schiff has been privy to the details of the still-secret memorandum of understanding the US reached with Qatar that put the five under a 12-month watch following their release.
“The Qataris did pretty good — I wouldn’t say perfect,” he said about the year-long monitoring. “But the big question is what comes next.”
At least one of the five allegedly contacted militants during the past year while in Qatar. No details have been disclosed about that contact, but the White House confirmed one was put under enhanced surveillance. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said last week: “I know that at least one has had communication with the Taliban.”
One or more of the detainees had some members of the Al-Qaida-affiliated Haqqani militant group travel to Qatar to meet with them earlier in the year, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. That was an indication the group was reaching out to communicate with so-called Taliban Five, said Graham, who predicts all five will rejoin the fight.
Four of the five former detainees remain on the United Nations’ blacklist, which freezes their assets and has them under a separate travel ban.
But the UN itself has acknowledged its travel ban has been violated. In a report late last year, the UN sanctions committee stated: “Regrettably, the monitoring team continues to receive a steady — albeit officially unconfirmed — flow of media reports indicating that some listed individuals have become increasingly adept at circumventing the sanctions measures, the travel ban in particular.”
The State Department insists US officials work to mitigate the risk of former Guantanamo detainees returning to the fight, threatening Americans or jeopardising US national security.
US officials have noted in the past that the five Taliban leaders are middle-aged or older, were former officials in the Taliban government and probably wouldn’t be seen again on any battlefield, although they could continue to be active members of the Taliban.
Under terms of the exchange in May 2014, the five detainees were sent to Qatar where officials there agreed to monitor their activities and prevent them from travelling out of the country. In return, Bergdahl was released to the US military after being held captive by the Taliban for nearly five years after he walked away from his Army post in Afghanistan.
US officials have discussed with the Qataris the possibility of extending the travel ban after it expires on June 1. But so far, the White House has not publicly announced any new agreement with Qatar, meaning the five could leave the tiny nation on the Arabian Peninsula at the end of the month.
“In Congress, we spent a lot of time debating whether the Qataris were going to adequately keep an eye on them in the course of the 12 months,” said Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee. “My point all along was that I’m more worried about month No. 13 than the first 12.”
Schiff has been privy to the details of the still-secret memorandum of understanding the US reached with Qatar that put the five under a 12-month watch following their release.
“The Qataris did pretty good — I wouldn’t say perfect,” he said about the year-long monitoring. “But the big question is what comes next.”
At least one of the five allegedly contacted militants during the past year while in Qatar. No details have been disclosed about that contact, but the White House confirmed one was put under enhanced surveillance. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said last week: “I know that at least one has had communication with the Taliban.”
One or more of the detainees had some members of the Al-Qaida-affiliated Haqqani militant group travel to Qatar to meet with them earlier in the year, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. That was an indication the group was reaching out to communicate with so-called Taliban Five, said Graham, who predicts all five will rejoin the fight.
Four of the five former detainees remain on the United Nations’ blacklist, which freezes their assets and has them under a separate travel ban.
But the UN itself has acknowledged its travel ban has been violated. In a report late last year, the UN sanctions committee stated: “Regrettably, the monitoring team continues to receive a steady — albeit officially unconfirmed — flow of media reports indicating that some listed individuals have become increasingly adept at circumventing the sanctions measures, the travel ban in particular.”
The State Department insists US officials work to mitigate the risk of former Guantanamo detainees returning to the fight, threatening Americans or jeopardising US national security.
US officials have noted in the past that the five Taliban leaders are middle-aged or older, were former officials in the Taliban government and probably wouldn’t be seen again on any battlefield, although they could continue to be active members of the Taliban.
-
50 Cent Gets Standing Ovation From Eminem In New 'award Video' -
Bad Bunny Delivers Sharp Message To Authorities In Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Prince William 'worst Nightmare' Becomes Reality -
Thai School Shooting: Gunman Opened Fire At School In Southern Thailand Holding Teachers, Students Hostage -
Britain's Chief Prosecutor Breaks Silence After King Charles Vows To Answer All Andrew Questions -
Maxwell Could Get 'shot In The Back Of The Head' If Released: US Congressman -
New EU Strategy Aims To Curb Threat Of Malicious Drones -
Halle Berry On How 3 Previous Marriages Shaped Van Hunt Romance -
Facebook Rolls Out AI Animated Profile Pictures And New Creative Tools -
NHS Warning To Staff On ‘discouraging First Cousin Marriage’: Is It Medically Justified? -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Flew Money In Suitcases To Launder: New Allegation Drops -
Nancy Guthrie Abduction: Piers Morgan Reacts To 'massive Breakthrough' In Baffling Case -
Adam Mosseri Set To Testify In Court Over Social Media Addiction Claims -
Will Warner Bros Finalize Deal With Paramount Or Stays Loyal With Netflix's Offer? -
Palace Spotlights Queen Camilla For Her Work With Vision-impaired Children A Day After Andrew Statement -
Kim Kardashian Still 'very Angry' At Meghan Markle, Prince Harry