SHC overrules NAB’s request for Sharmila’s disqualification
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday set aside the National Accountability Bureau’s letter to the Election Commission seeking Pakistan People Party MPA Sharmila Farooqui’s disqualification on the basis of her plea bargain in 2001.
The PPP MPA elected an MPA on a reserved seat for women, has filed a petition challenging the investigative agency’s letter to the Election Commission. The petitioner’s counsel, Haseeb Jamali, had submitted in the petition that the NAB’s letters were illegal. He said the Supreme Court had reduced the disqualification period under the plea bargain from 21 to 10 years; therefore, the conviction of the petitioner under NAB’s ordinance “does not hold any field”. He requested the court to restrain the bureau and other respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner.
The SHC’s division comprising Chief Justice Ahmed Ali M Sheikh and Justice Mohammad Karim Khan Agha observed that the petitioner will not be disqualified from holding public office on basis of her voluntary return, since she was neither convicted nor a public office holder at the time of the offence. The court set aside the NAB's letter regarding petitioner’s disqualification but made it clear that all other parts of the judgment will remain in full force as they do not relate to disqualification.
The NAB letter had stated that Sharmila, her mother Anisa Farooqui and father Usman Farooqui stood disqualified for a period of 21 years as per the judgment of the accountability court declared on April 28, 2001, under Section 15 of the ordinance, and sought legal action against her. According to NAB’s reference, former Pakistan Steel Mill chairman Usman Farooqi, her spouse Anisa and daughter Sharmila were indicted by the Accountability Court for possessing the national saving certificates worth around Rs. 40 million beyond their known sources of income; however, prior to the announcement of the judgment, the defendants entered into a plea bargain and agreed to return the money. The court had allowed the plea bargain but disqualified them for holding any public office for 21 years.
-
81-year-old Florida Woman Arrested After Chilling Murder Plot -
Cardi B Scores Major Earn Against Offset In Legal Battle -
Bella Hadid Gets Honest About Receiving Support From 'The Beauty' Co-stars -
Nobel Foundation Reaffirms Its Core Responsibility To ‘safeguard The Dignity Of The Nobel Prizes’ -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Warned Of Meghan Markle’s UK Return -
Melissa Leo Reveals How Winning An Oscar Made Things Worse -
Piers Morgan In Hospital: Here's Why -
IPhone 18 Pro Leaked: New Design Reveals Radical Corner Camera Layout -
Kung Fu Legend Siu-Lung Leung Passes Away At 77 -
Kim Kardashian To Remove Ex Kanye West From Her Kids' Names -
Queens Mother Arrested After Abducting Child From Court-ordered Visit -
Sarah Ferguson Ready To ‘spread Her Wings’ After Separating From ‘disgraced’ Andrew -
Finn Wolfhard Shares How Industry Views Him Post 'Stranger Things' -
Dylan O'Brien Gets Nostalgic After Reunion With Old Friend -
UK Doctors Warn Screen Time Is Harming Children’s Health -
Meghan Markle To Get Police Protection In UK If Travelling With Archie, Lilibet