Nawaz’s statement: It’s a turning point for Pakistan, says US

Ag Agencies

WASHINGTON: The US on Friday said that former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s statements regarding the 26/11 Mumbai attacks is an inflection point for the country. The

statement was passed by Assistant to the Secretary of Defence for Public Affairs Dana White during the regular briefing held at the Pentagon.

She reiterated that the US expects more from Pakistan and hopes it will play a major role in maintaining peace.

She expressed hope that Pakistan will be a partner in safeguarding the region and would do more to uphold regional peace in South Asia.

Referring to the security situation in Afghanistan White said Pakistan had been a victim of terrorism and alleged that the Pakistan and Afghanistan have also sponsored terrorism.

The US claim has been refuted multiple times by the country’s top military and civil hierarchy. Pakistan over the years has carried out comprehensive counter insurgency operations in the tribal areas once a hotbed for militancy and has been successful in restoring the writ of the state and eliminating terrorist safe havens on Pakistani soil.

The Pentagon spokesman further said that Pakistan can do more with respect to the security of Afghanistan.

On January 1 US President Donald Trump said that the US foolishly gave aid to Pakistan over the course of 15 years but Islamabad remained deceitful by providing safe havens to terrorists from Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, three members of the US House of Representatives have urged the Trump administration to work with Pakistan on building bilateral and strategic dialogues, instead of taking unilateral steps against the country.

The ranking member on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations; and co-chair of the Congressional Pakistan Caucus, Sheila Jackson Lee; along with Congressmen Al Green and Tom Suozzi remarked to send a strong message to the administration for its intensified dealings with Pakistan.

The three House members maintained that the administration "should not use a hammer on an ally that has been a friend of the United States for a very long time." Congresswoman Lee took the lead to point out that it was in the best interest of the US to stabilise not only Pakistan but the region writ large.

"We have a path way forward of engagement with Pakistan," Congresswoman Lee said adding, "We have Pakistani people who want peace, who want to fight against extremism, and fight against terrorism. We have an Afghan military that wants security along the border." She also criticised the administration's move to restrict the movement of Pakistani diplomats in the US; and suggested that the two sides need to come to table to talk and use diplomacy to resolve issues.

She announced that the three members will also convene a meeting of the administration officials and State Department representatives on US-Pakistan issues. She insisted that a unilateral policy by the Trump administration to ward Pakistan will not work. "It needs to be bilateral, and engagement not only with the people in Pakistan especially the civilian population but also Pakistani Americans for the right kind of diplomacy.

Congressman Suozzi said that US has concerns about the Pak-Afghan border. "In order for us to try and resolve the problems we face in Afghanistan, we need to figure out how we align our interests with those of Pakistan, because Pakistan will always be concerned about what’s going on in Afghanistan."

He said that Pakistan has asked US help to secure the border area from the Afghani side, and as a member of the Armed Services committee he questioned General Mattis and General Dunford about what efforts can be made to try and secure the border from the Afghan side and into Pakistani side. "Efforts are being made to try and build a bilateral relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan specifically on this issue of border control between the two areas," he said.

"The stick is always available," Congressman Al Green commented referring to the Stick and Carrot policy that had been used by the US in the past. He suggested that it was much better to engage in diplomacy with a wide range of partners, so that all of the persons associated with endeavor can be properly aligned. He said that the current administration "does not choose to align persons so that we can make a positive progress. This is an unfortunate circumstance."