Unfulfilled pledge: Lawyers move PHC to seek CM’s disqualification
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court Bar Association (PHCBA) on Wednesday moved the Peshawar High Court (PHC) to seek disqualification of Chief Minister Pervez Khattak for not honouring a pledge of grant.
The lawyers’ body claimed that under Articles 62 and 63 of Constitution the chief minister was no more Sadiq and Ameen as he couldn’t honour his announcement of Rs10 million grant to the Bar.
The writ petition was filed by PHCBA through its general secretary Rahmanullah Khan. Chief Minister Pervez Khattak, Chief Secretary, Secretary Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Secretary Finance and Advocate General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa were made parties in the petition. The lawyers’ body stated in the petition that the chief minister in his address to the gathering of the PHCBA had announced a special grant of Rs10 million in March 2016. It said the reports about the announcement were carried in the press.
“The petitioner (PHCBA) submitted various letters through its presidents and general secretaries to the respondent, chief minister, but no response was received from the government side,” the lawyer body claimed in the petition.
Recently, it said that a unanimous resolution was also passed by the association in its general body meeting and decided that a legal way would be adopted for the legal rights of the lawyers by filing a writ petition.
“The Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is not fulfilling its commitment regarding Rs10 million grant to the petitioner, he has no right/not eligible to hold the office of member provincial assembly and chief minister of the province and shall be disqualified under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution,” the PHC Bar Association submitted in the petition.
It said that the chief minister didn’t fulfill the criteria, which was essential for the member of the provincial assembly under Article 113 of the Constitution.
It was stated that every elected member of the assembly shall be Ameen and honest under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court also held in the famous Panama case that the elected member shall be honest and Ameen.
It was further submitted that the respondents have issued special grants of Rs3 million to Bannu Bar Association and Rs1 million to Dir Bar Association, but ignored the PHCBA, which was discrimination on the part of the respondents and violation of Article 4 and 25 of the Constitution.
The PHCBA prayed before the high court to direct the respondents to release the announced special grant
The lawyers’ body prayed for disqualification of the chief minister as member of the provincial assembly within the purview of Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution.
As interim relief, the bar association requested the court to stop the respondent, chief minister, from performing his duties and responsibilities till final decision in the petition.
-
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles' -
AI-powered Police Robots To Fight Crime By 2028: Report -
Everything We Know About Jessie J's Breast Cancer Journey -
Winter Olympics 2026: What To Watch In Men’s Hockey Today -
Winnie Harlow Breaks Vitiligo Stereotypes: 'I'm Not A Sufferer' -
Apple Martin Opens Up About Getting 'crazy' Lip Filler -
Why Did OpenAI Remove One Crucial Word From Its Mission Statement? -
Prince William Warned His Future Reign Will Be Affected By Andrew Scandal -
Amy Madigan Reflects On Husband Ed Harris' Support After Oscar Nomination -
Is Studying Medicine Useless? Elon Musk’s Claim That AI Will Outperform Surgeons Sparks Debate -
Margot Robbie Gushes Over 'Wuthering Heights' Director: 'I'd Follow Her Anywhere' -
'The Muppet Show' Star Miss Piggy Gives Fans THIS Advice -
Sarah Ferguson Concerned For Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Amid Epstein Scandal