Tue September 25, 2018
Advertisement
Can't connect right now! retry

add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!

add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!
Must Read

Opinion

October 30, 2017

Share

Advertisement

Casting couch

For years, various celebrities and shows referred to Weinstein’s repulsive behavior with thinly veiled jabs. Shows like Entourage and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, and Seth MacFarlane at the 2013 Oscars all feature off-color jokes about the ‘open secret’ of Weinstein’s misconduct with women. When The      New York Times          and then the New Yorker     released explosive investigations     in early October detailing Weinstein’s sexual misconduct, actors and producers changed their tone from whispers, sarcasm, and humor, to outrage. Since the beginning of Hollywood, women regard working for predatory moguls like Weinstein as a necessary evil. Stars with long-spanning careers like Jane Fonda are speaking out about how the exploitation of women in the film industry is ancient yet pervasive.

It’s worth noting the industry dynamics that places victims in the path of abuse: power in Hollywood is highly concentrated. Most films produced over the course of Hollywood’s history are distributed by industry titans like Fox, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount, Universal, and Disney. With the advent of online streaming, now there are smaller companies competing with the titans. Although production companies don’t retain actors under long-term contracts anymore as MGM did in the 1930s and 1940s, the executive producers of these production companies are the gatekeepers to any actor’s or producer’s success.

Questionable practices by unions sustain the toxic concentration of power. Canadian actress Mia Kirshner, one of Weinstein’s victims, denounced Hollywood unions for having   lax or nonexistent     policies to address inappropriate practices by studio executives such as private meetings in hotel rooms. She explains that unions like SAG (Screen Actors’ Guild) and ACTRA (Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists) also have no protocols in place to enforce third-party investigations into allegations of sexual harassment. Thisloophole          leaves internal investigations to be conducted by the accused perpetrator himself, which sidesteps impartiality in the process. ACTRA has no system or database that tracks missed work opportunities of those who file a complaint. If an actor is never hired by the alleged perpetrator again, there are no penalties to address unfairly denied work opportunities.

Hollywood is also an industry defined by heavily skewed supply and demand – there are so many people trying to “make it” in an industry where jobs are scarce. A woman’s bargaining chips are her attractiveness and sexuality and a handful of men like Weinstein hold all the capital to make these women’s dreams come true. Some of Weinstein’s victims recount feeling         pressured to fake     consent and pleasure so they didn’t lose the narrow window of opportunity to make their big breaks in Hollywood. Stars like    Emma Thompsonmade broader references to a “gender dysfunction” and a “crisis of extreme masculinity” in the industry. Thompson says it’s normal for women to be harassed by male executives and crew alike, because so few women hold positions of power at these companies.

Even the        confidentiality clauses          of Weinstein’s employment contract silenced many of his victims, so long as he paid out the women alleging harassment against him along with a fine. Disturbing, but true in a world where powerful misogynists run the show. A perfect storm is sustained where abusive moguls hide behind paying off victims for their silence and throwing money at politicians and philanthropic causes; these shows of influence grant them social and economic protection from convictions of sexual harassment.

It might not always be like this, though. Due to the rapid expansion of the internet, the democratization of creative content is taking power away from the monopolies that studio executives held for so long.

This article has been excerpted from: ‘The Business of ‘Casting Couch’ Culture.’

Courtesy: Counterpunch.org

 

Advertisement

Comments

Advertisement
Advertisement

Topstory

Opinion

Newspost

Editorial

National

World

Sports

Business

Karachi

Lahore

Islamabad

Peshawar