Australian PM rejects tax exemption
SYDNEY: Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has rejected a call from his government backbench to exempt the county's big four banks from a tax package aimed at reducing company tax rate from 30 percent to 25 percent.
Speaking to reporters in Queenstown, New Zealand on Saturday, Turnbull insisted that a company tax cut has to be applied without exemption.
"A company tax rate has got to really go across all corporations," Turnbull said. "Distinguishing between one sector and another is not a practical measure. I’m not aware of that ever being done in any other jurisdiction."
Bankbench anger about Australia's highly profitable banking sector has been stoked in recent times by a series of damaging scandals that have raised questions about probity and culture at Australia's big four retail banks, which last financial year reported a combined net profit of $29.65 billion.
Australia's top banks are the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac Banking Corp, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group and National Australia Bank.
Following release of the report “Financial Advice: Fees for no service” by the Australian Securities Commission and Investments Commision (ASIC) in October 2016, it emerged that Westpac, the ANZ, NAB and the Commonwealth Bank had been ordered to return $178 million in refunds and compensation to customers who had been unfairly billed for financial advice.
The reputational damage incurred by the advice scandal has been compounded by revelations of interest rate rigging and the consistent refusal of the major banks to pass on to consumers official rate cuts in their entirety.
In addition, some backbenchers argue that Australia's banks, whose profits are heavily geared to real estate and the domestic economy, are largely insulated from the kinds of global economic shocks which can seriously harm other industries.
Turnbull on Saturday also reiterated his opposition to a banking Royal Commission, saying the government's proposed one-stop shop financial services ombudsman would be able to deal fairly with disputes between consumers and financial services providers.
-
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein -
Miranda Kerr Shares The One Wellness Practice She Does With Her Kids -
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15