Australian PM rejects tax exemption
SYDNEY: Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has rejected a call from his government backbench to exempt the county's big four banks from a tax package aimed at reducing company tax rate from 30 percent to 25 percent.
Speaking to reporters in Queenstown, New Zealand on Saturday, Turnbull insisted that a company tax cut has to be applied without exemption.
"A company tax rate has got to really go across all corporations," Turnbull said. "Distinguishing between one sector and another is not a practical measure. I’m not aware of that ever being done in any other jurisdiction."
Bankbench anger about Australia's highly profitable banking sector has been stoked in recent times by a series of damaging scandals that have raised questions about probity and culture at Australia's big four retail banks, which last financial year reported a combined net profit of $29.65 billion.
Australia's top banks are the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac Banking Corp, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group and National Australia Bank.
Following release of the report “Financial Advice: Fees for no service” by the Australian Securities Commission and Investments Commision (ASIC) in October 2016, it emerged that Westpac, the ANZ, NAB and the Commonwealth Bank had been ordered to return $178 million in refunds and compensation to customers who had been unfairly billed for financial advice.
The reputational damage incurred by the advice scandal has been compounded by revelations of interest rate rigging and the consistent refusal of the major banks to pass on to consumers official rate cuts in their entirety.
In addition, some backbenchers argue that Australia's banks, whose profits are heavily geared to real estate and the domestic economy, are largely insulated from the kinds of global economic shocks which can seriously harm other industries.
Turnbull on Saturday also reiterated his opposition to a banking Royal Commission, saying the government's proposed one-stop shop financial services ombudsman would be able to deal fairly with disputes between consumers and financial services providers.
-
Prince Harry, Mark Dyer Release Statement After Sued For Libel By Sentebale -
Meghan Trainor Details How Online Hate Made Her Cry Despite Becoming A Mom -
Man Arrested For Allegedly Throwing Molotov Cocktail At Sam Altman’s House -
Stephen Curry's Ankle Injury Sparks Concerns Ahead Of LA Clippers Game -
27% Of Workers Say AI Replaces Some Job Tasks: Survey -
Abbey Romeo, David Isaacman Release Joint Statement After Shocking Split -
Brittney Griner Signs With Sun In Major Deal As Team Builds For Final Seasons Before Houston Move -
Melania Trump’s Remarks Reignite Epstein Questions As Survivors Speak Out -
Why Megan Fox Is 'upset' With Machine Gun Kelly: Shocking Details Revealed -
Cyclone Vaianu: Strong Winds And Flood Threat Spark Mass Evacuations -
Jessica Biel Urges Parents To Stop Using Viral Parenting Hack For Major Reason -
Brandon Valenzuela Shines With First MLB Home Run As Blue Jays Surge Past Twins 10-4 -
Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Assassin Reveals Shock ‘opportunity’ In Ongoing Case -
Tyler Rogers And Taylor Rogers Show How Twin Brothers Can Dominate MLB In Completely Different Ways -
OpenAI Reports Security Issue In Third-party Tool Axios, Assures User Data Protection -
Finneas O'Connell Shares Insight Into Wedding Planning With Fiancée Claudia Sulewski