Establishment of military courts challenged
Karachi The establishment of the proposed military courts was challenged in the Supreme Court on Wednesday by a non-government organisation. Petitioner Altaf Shakoor, president of PASBAN, stated in his application that after the Peshawar killings the government’s decision to set up military courts when anti-terrorism courts were also working for
By Jamal Khurshid
January 01, 2015
Karachi
The establishment of the proposed military courts was challenged in the Supreme Court on Wednesday by a non-government organisation.
Petitioner Altaf Shakoor, president of PASBAN, stated in his application that after the Peshawar killings the government’s decision to set up military courts when anti-terrorism courts were also working for the same purpose.
He said the only reason cited by the government for setting up military courts was the “increase in terrorist activities” though police and other law-enforcement agencies had failed to protect the lives of citizens and control the law and order situation.
The petitioner stated that the personnel of police and other law-enforcement agencies were not trained like the armed forces in dealing with terrorists. He said it was necessary to train law-enforcement personnel effectively so that they act against criminal elements send them to courts for punishment.
He said the government instead of removing deficiencies in the police and law-enforcement agencies had resorted to inducting military courts supervised by army personnel and such action was tantamount to running a parallel judicial system in the country which was not only a violation of the constitution but was also lethal for the democratic system.
He said the role of law-enforcement agencies in arresting culprits involved in terrorism used to criticise unfair treatment and false implication of citizens due to political influence, adding that in case military courts depended upon investigation of the police the very purpose of right of fair trial guaranteed under the constitution would be seriously affected.
The military courts had been declared illegal by the Supreme Court and formation of these courts would be a violation of the court’s decision, he contended.
He requested the court to bar the government from making amendments in the constitution by declaring formation of military courts illegal.
The establishment of the proposed military courts was challenged in the Supreme Court on Wednesday by a non-government organisation.
Petitioner Altaf Shakoor, president of PASBAN, stated in his application that after the Peshawar killings the government’s decision to set up military courts when anti-terrorism courts were also working for the same purpose.
He said the only reason cited by the government for setting up military courts was the “increase in terrorist activities” though police and other law-enforcement agencies had failed to protect the lives of citizens and control the law and order situation.
The petitioner stated that the personnel of police and other law-enforcement agencies were not trained like the armed forces in dealing with terrorists. He said it was necessary to train law-enforcement personnel effectively so that they act against criminal elements send them to courts for punishment.
He said the government instead of removing deficiencies in the police and law-enforcement agencies had resorted to inducting military courts supervised by army personnel and such action was tantamount to running a parallel judicial system in the country which was not only a violation of the constitution but was also lethal for the democratic system.
He said the role of law-enforcement agencies in arresting culprits involved in terrorism used to criticise unfair treatment and false implication of citizens due to political influence, adding that in case military courts depended upon investigation of the police the very purpose of right of fair trial guaranteed under the constitution would be seriously affected.
The military courts had been declared illegal by the Supreme Court and formation of these courts would be a violation of the court’s decision, he contended.
He requested the court to bar the government from making amendments in the constitution by declaring formation of military courts illegal.
-
AI Innovation Could Make Trade Secrets More Valuable Than Patents, Says Billionaire Investor -
King Charles Heckling: Calls For 10 BAFTAs And A Knighthood For Sign Language Interpreter -
Kim Kardashian Leaves Meghan Markle 'upset' With Latest 'cheap Shot' -
Royal Expert On Andrew, Sarah Ferguson’s ‘entitled’ Behaviour Since Marriage -
Instagram And YouTube Accused Of Engineering Addiction In Children’s Brains -
Trump Reached Out To Police Chief Investigating Epstein In 2006, Records Show -
Keke Palmer Praises Actor Who Inspired 'The Burbs' Role -
Humans May Have 33 Senses, Not 5: New Study Challenges Long-held Science -
Kim Kardashian Prepared To Have Child With Lewis Hamilton: 'Baby Using A Surrogate' -
Internet Splits Over New York's Toilet Data Amid Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Show -
Prince William Inspects Saudi Arabia's Efforts To Promote Football In Young Girls -
Northern Lights: Calm Conditions Persist Amid Low Space Weather Activity -
'Look What Andrew Has Done': Meghan Markle Defended On Jeremy Vine Show -
Apple, Google Agree To Make 'app Store' Changes Over UK Regulator Concerns -
Autodesk Files Lawsuit Against Google Over AI Video Tool Trademark Dispute -
San Francisco 49ers Player Shot Near Post-Super Bowl Party