The UN Security Council has approved a US-sponsored resolution to deploy an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) and establish a transitional ‘Board of Peace’ in Gaza. On paper, it reads like a breakthrough. In reality, it is a blueprint for uncertainty, fragile legitimacy and rushed optics. The ISF lacks a classical UN peacekeeping mandate, transparent command and operational autonomy. It is to act ‘in consultation’ with regional powers while Palestinian institutions are marginalised. Borders, humanitarian corridors and arms control remain unresolved. Palestinians must also not be relegated to mere spectators. Any transition must embed the Palestinian Authority, civil society and local governance as enforceable decision-makers, not symbolic advisers. The ISF’s legitimacy and effectiveness will hinge on empowering Palestinians to manage reconstruction, protection and governance. Without this, even a well-resourced mission risks being perceived as an occupying force.
Majid Burfat
Karachi
