Punjab govt to decide on sending Imran’s case to military court: law minister
Tarar said case of Faiz Hameed did not come into purview of Law Ministry as he was being tried under Army Act
ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Law and Justice Senator Azam Nazeer Tarar said on Thursday that if needed, the Punjab government would decide to refer Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf founder chairman Imran Khan’s case to a military court.
“The prosecution of May 9 cases is being done by the Punjab government and the provincial government will decide to refer the case to a military court,” he said in an informal talk with media persons on Thursday at the Presidency after President Asif Ali Zardari conferred Hilal-i-Imtiaz on Olympic gold medalist Arshad Nadeem.
Tarar said the case of Lt Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed did not come into the purview of Law Ministry as he was being tried under the Army Act.
In a reply to a question, the law minister made it clear that there was no surprise legislation in the offing, rejecting the rumours of any constitutional amendment in the joint session of parliament. He clarified that neither a constitutional amendment can be passed nor it can be introduced in the joint session of parliament. He said if the constitutional amendment is to be presented, it has to be introduced in both houses of parliament separately from where it has to be passed through a two-thirds majority. “Media should avoid speculations and show responsibility,” he said.
He said dozens of bills which were approved by either house of parliament and not passed by the other within 90 days would be brought in the upcoming joint sitting.
To a question on extension in the tenure of Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa, the law minister said that no such proposal was currently under consideration. “It is not for me to decide whether the term of chief justice will be extended or not,” he said.
To a question on the private member bill of JUIF legislator Noor Alam Khan to abolish the contempt of court law, Tarar responded that personally, he did not support the abolition of contempt of court. “The Contempt of Court Act is designed to meet the requirements of Article 204 of the Constitution,” he said. He said if a member wants to bring a bill on a private member’s day, it cannot be stopped.
-
Bryce Huff Shocks NFL With Retirement At 27 To Start Company Fighting Lithium Battery Fires -
USS Gerald R. Ford Fire: Two Injured After Fire Breaks Out On US Navy Aircraft Carrier -
US: New Survey Shows One-third Of Americans Cut Back On Other Expenses To Cover Healthcare In 2025 -
Adobe's Longtime CEO To Exit Role As AI Disruption Shakes Software Industry; Shares Fall 22% -
Cillian Murphy Recalls Acting Advice That Shaped His Career -
Whistler Ski Resort Rockfall Shuts Peak Express Lift As Crews Assess Damage On Whistler Peak -
Surprising Stowaway: Sly Red Fox Travels From England To US On Cargo Ship -
King Charles Picks To Stay Miles Away From Meghan, Prince Harry Antics -
Dakota Johnson In Not Rush To Find Perfect Man After Chris Martin Split -
William And Kate Trigger Huge Fan Reaction With London's Iconic River Visit -
Kanye West's Concert In Madrid Faces Scam Rumours As Fake Tweet Goes Viral -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Step Into Centuries-old London Tradition -
Princess Diana Felt The ‘burden’ Of Prince William As King, Insider Reveals -
Andrew Private Deal 'protects' Beatrice & Eugenie's Royal Homes Despite His Bombshell Scandal -
Eminem Reacts To DJ Lord Sear's Death: 'Made The World A Better Place' -
Prince William Objects To ‘unhealthy’ Aspect Of Royal Upbringing