SHC moved against intelligence agency’s surveillance powers
A petition was filed in the Sindh High Court, challenging the federal government’s decision to grant permission to intelligence agencies to intercept citizens’ calls and messages.
Advocate Abdul Ahad submitted in the petition that the federal government issued an SRO that empowered BS-18 or above officers of an intelligence agency to surveil citizens in the name of national security.
He submitted the home department also issued a notification authorizing the agency to nominate an officer not below rank of grade 18 to intercept calls and messages and trace calls through any telecommunication system under the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority Act.
He said the notification issued under the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) Act’s Section 54 was illegal and the Fair Trial Act 2013 had a complete mechanism for this matter.
He said articles 9 and 14 of the constitution protect the fundamental rights of privacy and dignity of the citizen and the impugned SRO is a clear violation of the constitutional rights of the citizens.
The petitioner requested the court to declare the impugned notification null and void and abuse of authority.
Missing persons:
The Sindh High Court dismissed a petition against alleged enforced disappearance of a citizen as the petitioner withdrew the petition by submitting that the citizen was shown arrested by the police.
Farzana Ghaffar had filed the petition against enforced disappearance of Bilal Haider, a seminary teacher, from the Qayyumabad area on July 8. She submitted that personnel of law enforcement agencies had picked up the detainee and his whereabouts were unknown.
The petitioner submitted that Counter Terrorism Department’s officials had confirmed arrest of Bilal Haider and she did not want to contest the petition as the whereabouts of the detainee were known now.
The court after taking the statement of the petitioner on record dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
-
Jennifer Aniston Already Decided Her Wedding Dress? -
Prince Harry, Meghan’s Hollywood Party Drama Exposes Chaotic PR Strategy -
Jennifer Garner Reacts To Savannah Guthrie's Video As Search For Nancy Guthrie Continues -
Bad Bunny Leaves Fans Worried With Major Move After Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Captain Jason Talks Personal Hardships He Faced Ahead Of 'Below Deck' Season 4 -
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California