ECP put on notice on JI’s plea against law allowing unelected persons to contest mayoral poll
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Thursday issued notices to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), Sindh advocate general and others on a petition that has challenged an amendment to the Sindh Local Government Act 2013 that allows unelected persons to contest the election to the mayoral post.
The petitioner, Hafiz Naeemur Rehman, who is the Karachi Jamaat-e-Islami emir and has been elected as the chairman of the Union Committee 8 of North Nazimabad, had submitted in the petition that the government introduced an amendment to the local government act waiving the condition that only an elected person could contest the election for the slot of the mayor of a metropolitan corporation, and chairman of town and municipal committees.The JI leader said that the section 3 of the amended law allowed any person to be elected to the post of the chairman or mayor and cast away the precondition of the membership/election, which, he said, was illegal on account that the representative democracy was premised on the vesting of executive authority with persons who were elected representatives and members of a constitutive body.
He further submitted that the impugned amendment was promulgated and deemed to have taken force on and from December 31, 2021, whereby a past and closed electoral process had been infringed upon by making an allowance for an unelected person to be elected to the post of chairman or mayor. He said the amendment subverted the electoral process and sought the appointment of an unelected person with the aim to allow the same person to exercise the executive authority. He said the legislation was a clear attempt at prejudicing the electoral process, which meant a non-elected person shall be entitled to hold a public office and exercise executive authority indefinitely.
He said the amendment was a calculated attempt to favour certain persons, and requested the high court to declare it unlawful. The SHC was requested to declare the impugned amendment as unconstitutional and restrain the respondents from taking action pursuant to the Section 180-B of the local government law till the disposal of the petition. A division bench of the SHC headed by Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed after a preliminary hearing of the petition issued notices to the ECP and advocate general, and called their comments on June 13.
-
Piers Morgan Finally Reacts To Brooklyn Beckham's Statement About David And Victoria Beckham -
Tom Hiddleston Reveals Unlikely DC Character That Inspired Loki -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Warned 2026 Will Be 'a Big Test' For Them -
OpenAI Plans First ChatGPT Device For 2026 -
Matt Damon Gets Slammed Over 'out Of Touch' Comparison -
From Chagos Islands To Greenland Trump Flags National Security Risks: Here’s Why -
Meghan’s UK Return As ‘successful Businesswoman’ Will Put Pressure On Kate Middleton -
Spotify Tests Page Match To Sync Books With Audiobooks -
King Charles Breaks Cover Amid Prince Harry's Presence In Britain -
Real Reason King, William, Kate Have Arranged To Avoid Harry During UK Trip -
Trump Trolls European Leaders With AI Map Showing Greenland As U.S. Territory -
AI Vs Reality: How Deepfakes Are Warping Story Of Maduro’s US Capture -
Why Ryan Coogler Got Worried After Pitching 'Sinners' To Michael B Jordan -
Princess Diana's Brother Shares Emotional Post After Prince Harry Returns To UK Without Meghan, Archie, Lilibet -
'Disgraced' Andrew Gets Away With Major Double Standard Over Royal Lodge -
Carson Beck Girlfriend Rumours Explained Amid CFP Championship Run