SHC reserves judgment on plea against
direct appointments of education board officers
Karachi
The Sindh High Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on petitions against the provincial government’s decision on direct appointments of secretaries and controllers for the intermediate, secondary and technical boards of the province.
Prof Anwar Ahmed Zai, Dr Masroor Ahmed Zai and others officers who were working as controllers of examinations and chairmen for different intermediate, secondary and technical boards of the province had challenged the proposed direct appointment through advertisements and a competitive process.
They submitted that the secretary to the chief minister for universities and boards had published advertisements for appointment of secretaries and controllers for the intermediate and secondary education boards of the province outside the service cadre of the post, which was not authorised as per the law and rules.
The petitioners contended that they were appointed by the competent authority and were qualified to be promoted as they were senior officers of their respective boards.
The provincial government, on the other hand, contended that the creditability of the educational boards of the province has been under question for long as allegations of favouritism, nepotism, result tampering and declining standards continue to pour in.
Thus, the government had decided in principle to induct professionals and qualified people through merit-based competition.
The provincial law officer submitted that the respondents who were holding the post of education board chairman or controller could also avail these opportunities if they were genuinely eligible for the post.
He submitted that all education boards in Sindh, except Hyderabad, have been working without a process of competitive, merit-based selection, with officers simply being chosen and appointed on a contract basis.
The law officer added that it was for this reason that the controlling authority reviewed all the appointments and decided that all hiring done without the due procedure be cancelled.
After hearing the arguments, the SHC division bench headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar reserved judgment over the matter.
-
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles' -
AI-powered Police Robots To Fight Crime By 2028: Report -
Everything We Know About Jessie J's Breast Cancer Journey -
Winter Olympics 2026: What To Watch In Men’s Hockey Today -
Winnie Harlow Breaks Vitiligo Stereotypes: 'I'm Not A Sufferer' -
Apple Martin Opens Up About Getting 'crazy' Lip Filler -
Why Did OpenAI Remove One Crucial Word From Its Mission Statement? -
Prince William Warned His Future Reign Will Be Affected By Andrew Scandal -
Amy Madigan Reflects On Husband Ed Harris' Support After Oscar Nomination -
Is Studying Medicine Useless? Elon Musk’s Claim That AI Will Outperform Surgeons Sparks Debate -
Margot Robbie Gushes Over 'Wuthering Heights' Director: 'I'd Follow Her Anywhere' -
'The Muppet Show' Star Miss Piggy Gives Fans THIS Advice -
Sarah Ferguson Concerned For Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Amid Epstein Scandal