Kh Asif submits employer’s letter to IHC
ISLAMABAD: On April 10, an Islamabad High Court (IHC) larger bench had reserved its judgment in a matter where a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Usman Dar sought disqualification of the federal minister for foreign affairs Khawaja Asif on the basis of an Abu Dhabi Iqama.
A larger bench, however, had allowed the parties to submit additional documents if they have. Khawaja Asif here on Monday submitted a letter of an Abu Dhabi company where he is employed. As per letter, Khawaja Asif’s job with International Mechanical & Electrical Co. WLL. is quite flexible and there are no conditions on him to stay there in Abu Dhabi. The company can seek his legal advice via telephone or whenever he comes to UAE. Managing Director of the company, Elias Salloum, has expressed that he is ready to come before any court in Pakistan.
The letter reads, “We hereby confirm that Kh. Muhammad Asif has been the “legal Advisor Private Law’ for the company. The agreement executed with him was a standard document approved by the UAE Government. The agreement was executed to fulfill UAW law, however, the terms stated in the agreement were not the understanding between the parties. The relationship has cordial, with mutual consent and there was no requirement for him to be present in UAE for any period of time and we have been seeking his advice as and when required telephonically and during his planned visit to UAE. Similarly, the agreement was renewed as per UAE law, he became the Management Consultant of the company.”
Asif was paid a fee for his services as per the understanding of the company and himself. Asif was never a full time employee of the company and was not required to stay in UAE as mentioned in the agreement.
There is total flexibility in the UAE after execution of the standard document to agree to any terms with the employees and Consultants of the company and the UAE Government does not interfere in this respect. The HEC three-member larger bench headed by Justice Athar Minallah and comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani had reserved judgment in this matter on April 10.
-
Prince Harry’s Mental Health Ends Up At Stake As Meghan Moves Him To 'second Fiddle' -
Bradley Cooper On Who His Mother Thinks Is The World’s Best Actor -
Meghan Markle Offers Glimpse Into Intimate Dance Moment With Harry Amid Split Rumors -
Jon Bon Jovi Joins The Viral 2016 Throwback Trend With Nostalgic Photos -
Kate Middleton Hailed For Her Lack Of ‘obligation’ As Well As Altruistic, Selfless Qualities -
Jason Momoa Says Being With Beau Adria Arjona Feels 'perfect' -
Idris Elba Says One Mix-up Nearly Cost Him A Knighthood From King Charles -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Incurs Anger Of Biggest Royal -
Megan Fox, Machine Gun Kelly's Relationship 'is Just About Co-parenting' -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Warned They Can’t Fool Brits Because It Won’t Land -
South Korea’s Ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol, Sentenced To 5 Years In Prison: Key Details Explained -
Princess Beatrice Is ‘terrified’ Of Mom Fergie: ‘She’s Begging Her To Not Destroy Her Future’ -
Harry Styles’ New Album Earns Subtle Nod From Zoe Kravitz’s Dad -
Ari Emanuel Makes A Decision Regarding His Memoir Alongside Prince Harry’s Ghostwriter -
Buckingham Palace Gives The Spotlight To The Duke And Duchess Of Edinburgh: Video -
Eva Mendes Revisits Year She Hid Pregnancy