CRTI rejects amendments to Right to Information Act
Demands withdrawal of exemption given to KP Assembly, PHC
By our correspondents
July 25, 2015
PESHAWAR: Rejecting the amendments to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013, the Coalition on Right to Information (CRTI) has presented a charter of demands aimed at restoring the status of Information Commission and ending the exemption given to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and Peshawar High Court (PHC).
Speaking at a press conference, Zahid Abdullah, coordinator for CRTI, a network of 30 civil society organisations working to protect and promote citizens’ right to information in the country, said that when the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013 was enacted, the CRTI appreciated it at every forum as it met standards of Right to Information legislation.
However, the amendments to this law by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly on June 23, 2015 have significantly diluted it, he added. Muhammad Anwar, executive director, Centre for Governance and Public Accountability, said that the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly exempted itself from the purview of the law without any debate and without seeking input from civil society groups.
“Furthermore, it lowered the status of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission making district courts the forum of appeal against the decisions of the Commission,” he noted. Lala Hassan from Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development said that CRTI had been demanding the inclusion of PHC within the purview of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013. Instead, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly exempted itself from the purview of the law, he added.
Through its charter of demands, the CRTI called upon the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government to withdraw amendments to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013 and bring Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and the PHC within the ambit of the Act. It also demanded making PHC the forum for appeal against the decisions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission, ensuring that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission has a chief information commissioner and two information commissioners taken from the bureaucracy, judiciary and civil society and immediately extending the KP RTI law to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Pata).
Speaking at a press conference, Zahid Abdullah, coordinator for CRTI, a network of 30 civil society organisations working to protect and promote citizens’ right to information in the country, said that when the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013 was enacted, the CRTI appreciated it at every forum as it met standards of Right to Information legislation.
However, the amendments to this law by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly on June 23, 2015 have significantly diluted it, he added. Muhammad Anwar, executive director, Centre for Governance and Public Accountability, said that the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly exempted itself from the purview of the law without any debate and without seeking input from civil society groups.
“Furthermore, it lowered the status of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission making district courts the forum of appeal against the decisions of the Commission,” he noted. Lala Hassan from Institute for Research, Advocacy and Development said that CRTI had been demanding the inclusion of PHC within the purview of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013. Instead, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly exempted itself from the purview of the law, he added.
Through its charter of demands, the CRTI called upon the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government to withdraw amendments to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Right to Information Act 2013 and bring Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and the PHC within the ambit of the Act. It also demanded making PHC the forum for appeal against the decisions of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission, ensuring that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Information Commission has a chief information commissioner and two information commissioners taken from the bureaucracy, judiciary and civil society and immediately extending the KP RTI law to Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Pata).
-
Mark Ruffalo Makes Strong Political Comments At 2026 Golden Globes -
Leonardo DiCaprio's Girlfriend Flaunts Stylish Dress After Golden Globes Age Joke -
Harry Styles Launches Secret Site, Fuels Comeback Speculation -
Kate Middleton's New Approach Expected To Draw Criticism From Meghan's Camp -
Jennifer Lawrence Admits Feeling Nervous Over Taking New Step -
Lee Cronin’s ‘The Mummy’ Drops Its Chilling First Trailer -
Louis Tomlinson Reveals What Former 1D Members' Dynamic Is After Liam Payne's Death -
Jacob Elordi, Ana De Armas Get Cozy During 2026 Golden Globes -
Meghan Markle Turns Juvenile And Plans Half Bit Ruse: ‘She’s Trying To Get On Her Radar’ -
Anthropic Rolls Out Healthcare Features For Claude AI Amid OpenAI Push -
Inside 'Stranger Things' Team's Daring Method To Film Finale -
Robert Irwin Announces His Return To Reality TV After 'DWTS' Victory -
Uber Faces Landmark Trial In US Over Sexual Assault Claim -
Zoë Kravitz Makes Major Decision Before Arriving At 2026 Golden Globes -
Jennifer Lawrence Offers Major Role To Ariana Grande, Singer Responds -
Maya Hawke Highlights Major Discrepancy In 'Stranger Things' Season 5