Changes in National Seed Amendment Act draft demanded
IslamabadAgriculture experts, students and the civil society demand drastic changes in final draft of National Seed Amendment Act 2014 to incorporate genuine concerns of small farmers, agriculture specialists, scholars and the civil society.Addressing the participants of a ‘Consultation on National Seed Policy’ held on Tuesday, Acting Country Director ActionAid Pakistan
By our correspondents
March 01, 2015
Islamabad
Agriculture experts, students and the civil society demand drastic changes in final draft of National Seed Amendment Act 2014 to incorporate genuine concerns of small farmers, agriculture specialists, scholars and the civil society.
Addressing the participants of a ‘Consultation on National Seed Policy’ held on Tuesday, Acting Country Director ActionAid Pakistan Daud Saqlain said that the imminent passage of National Seed Amendment Act 2014 would indirectly harm the basic spirit of 18th Amendment which empowered provinces to do direct legislation in agriculture sector.
Daud Saqlain said that the civil society and agriculture specialists including scientists, scholars, students and above all the small farmers should adopt a proactive approach of constructive engagement with the government particularly the concerned officials and departments to make them realize that certain provision of the proposed act were hostile and unfriendly to the interests of small farmers.
An agriculture experts and executive director of Lok Sanjh Dr. Shahid Zia, said that a few multinational companies doing business in agriculture research and products were influencing the government to pass the proposed National Seed Amendment 2014 in haste so that concerns of small farmers and the civil society were not entertained.
He alleged that the proposed act (if passed) would be a threat to national food security because it not only aimed at destroying local seed resource by modifying it genetically rather it imposed certain limitations on small farmers to buy the seed from open market each year and to abandon using and exchanging his/her own seed. After local seeds would be genetically engineered, application of Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIP) would become mandatory which would have serious implications for small scale farmers.
Wali Haider from Roots for Equity said that the public representatives and the government officials should be considerate to insecurities and worries of the small farmers who will be deprived of their indigenous source of free, cheap and climate effective seed just because the multinational companies would be legally empowered (after passage of the proposed act) to genetically modify the local seed and declare it their property.
The consultation session was interactive as it allowed participants to share their observations and concerns. Most of the participants were of the view that a comprehensive action plan should be worked out to strengthen the ongoing famers’ led campaign against the proposed passage of National Seed Amendment Act 2014. They said that the civil society should adopt more constructive approach of effective engagement with the government so that small farmers concerns are incorporated in the proposed act.
Agriculture experts, students and the civil society demand drastic changes in final draft of National Seed Amendment Act 2014 to incorporate genuine concerns of small farmers, agriculture specialists, scholars and the civil society.
Addressing the participants of a ‘Consultation on National Seed Policy’ held on Tuesday, Acting Country Director ActionAid Pakistan Daud Saqlain said that the imminent passage of National Seed Amendment Act 2014 would indirectly harm the basic spirit of 18th Amendment which empowered provinces to do direct legislation in agriculture sector.
Daud Saqlain said that the civil society and agriculture specialists including scientists, scholars, students and above all the small farmers should adopt a proactive approach of constructive engagement with the government particularly the concerned officials and departments to make them realize that certain provision of the proposed act were hostile and unfriendly to the interests of small farmers.
An agriculture experts and executive director of Lok Sanjh Dr. Shahid Zia, said that a few multinational companies doing business in agriculture research and products were influencing the government to pass the proposed National Seed Amendment 2014 in haste so that concerns of small farmers and the civil society were not entertained.
He alleged that the proposed act (if passed) would be a threat to national food security because it not only aimed at destroying local seed resource by modifying it genetically rather it imposed certain limitations on small farmers to buy the seed from open market each year and to abandon using and exchanging his/her own seed. After local seeds would be genetically engineered, application of Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIP) would become mandatory which would have serious implications for small scale farmers.
Wali Haider from Roots for Equity said that the public representatives and the government officials should be considerate to insecurities and worries of the small farmers who will be deprived of their indigenous source of free, cheap and climate effective seed just because the multinational companies would be legally empowered (after passage of the proposed act) to genetically modify the local seed and declare it their property.
The consultation session was interactive as it allowed participants to share their observations and concerns. Most of the participants were of the view that a comprehensive action plan should be worked out to strengthen the ongoing famers’ led campaign against the proposed passage of National Seed Amendment Act 2014. They said that the civil society should adopt more constructive approach of effective engagement with the government so that small farmers concerns are incorporated in the proposed act.
-
Prince William Questions Himself ‘what’s The Point’ After Saudi Trip -
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress -
Rosie O’Donnell Secretly Returned To US To Test Safety -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Spotted On Date Night On Valentine’s Day -
King Charles Butler Spills Valentine’s Day Dinner Blunders -
Brooklyn Beckham Hits Back At Gordon Ramsay With Subtle Move Over Remark On His Personal Life -
Meghan Markle Showcases Princess Lilibet Face On Valentine’s Day -
Harry Styles Opens Up About Isolation After One Direction Split -
Shamed Andrew Was ‘face To Face’ With Epstein Files, Mocked For Lying -
Kanye West Projected To Explode Music Charts With 'Bully' After He Apologized Over Antisemitism -
Leighton Meester Reflects On How Valentine’s Day Feels Like Now -
Sarah Ferguson ‘won’t Let Go Without A Fight’ After Royal Exile -
Adam Sandler Makes Brutal Confession: 'I Do Not Love Comedy First' -
'Harry Potter' Star Rupert Grint Shares Where He Stands Politically -
Drama Outside Nancy Guthrie's Home Unfolds Described As 'circus'