Private sector’s predicament
The formal private sector is caught in a perfect storm
The formal private sector is caught in a perfect storm. It could reconcile to a one-off Super Tax to help secure the IMF programme and save the country from default. But it isn’t a one-off Super Tax as we now know.
Its shareholders, many of whom are small savers, pensioners and widows who invested in listed companies instead of real estate could also accept reduced dividends, but for how long? Investment, already low as % of GDP, could stay there because of the reduced net tax profit, but again for how long?
The industry is now denied spares and components because of SBP’s new requirements to obtain clearance for opening letters of credit. How long can it hang in before laying people off? Those like textiles that rely on gas, which is in short supply, will need to curtail production impacting badly needed exports. And now because of the higher policy rate, the cost of borrowing will rise, threatening loan impairment levels for banks. So in multiple ways, we are killing the goose (called formal private sector) that lays the golden egg!
What does a high policy rate in a cost-push inflationary environment achieve? Demand is already depressed due to high commodity costs and devaluation. Whose demand is a higher policy rate targeting to compress? Auto and consumer loans are restricted already by SBP, bank cash reserve requirements have been increased, 100% cash margin has been levied already on import letters of credit and now SBP’s clearance is required (and delayed) for importing spares and components. What’s left to compress? The Non-Food Non-Energy (NFNE) inflation rate is 11.5%. A policy rate of 15% is an overkill.
The Policy Rate does not directly affect those who don’t borrow from banks. That’s more than half our economy -- those in the informal sector and many SMEs. It affects the formal private sector and the government. The government will borrow at any cost as it refuses to curtail its fiscal deficit. The private sector will struggle. To be fair, SBP did a superb job with various stimuli to offset the impact of Covid. It then also recognised the need to differentiate between demand-pull and cost-push inflation. A 15% policy rate is not justified in the current cost-push inflation environment.
Ehsan Malik is CEO of Pakistan Business Council
-
Andrew, Sarah Ferguson Refuse King Charles Request: 'Raising Eyebrows Inside Palace' -
Adam Sandler Reveals How Tom Cruise Introduced Him To Paul Thomas Anderson -
Washington Post CEO William Lewis Resigns After Sweeping Layoffs -
North Korea To Hold 9th Workers’ Party Congress In Late February -
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price -
Factory Explosion In North China Leaves Eight Dead -
Blac Chyna Opens Up About Her Kids: ‘Disturb Their Inner Child' -
Winter Olympics 2026: Milan Protestors Rally Against The Games As Environmentally, Economically ‘unsustainable’ -
How Long Is The Super Bowl? Average Game Time And Halftime Show Explained -
Natasha Bure Makes Stunning Confession About Her Marriage To Bradley Steven Perry -
ChatGPT Caricature Prompts Are Going Viral. Here’s List You Must Try -
James Pearce Jr. Arrested In Florida After Alleged Domestic Dispute, Falcons Respond -
Cavaliers Vs Kings: James Harden Shines Late In Cleveland Debut Win -
2026 Winter Olympics Snowboarding: Su Yiming Wins Bronze And Completes Medal Set