LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday sought a reply from the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) on a petition by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s MPA Ghazanfar Abbas Cheena challenging an inquiry of assets beyond means against him.
Mr Cheena through his counsel submitted that all of his assets properties were already declared in tax documents before the authorities concerned. He said the NAB initiated the inquiry against him without any cogent evidence of corrupt practice or violation of law. He asked the court to set aside the inquiry and call-up notices being issued by the NAB.
A two-judge bench comprising Justice Masood Abid Naqvi and Justice Sardar Ahmad Naeem directed the NAB to submit its reply by 28 July. Meanwhile, the bench allowed the NAB to submit reply to a petition by PML-N MNA Mohsin Shahnawaz Ranjha challenging an inquiry into alleged assets beyond means against him.
A NAB prosecutor sought time to file a reply and the bench adjourned hearing until 27 July. Mr Ranjha through a counsel stated before the NAB had been issuing call-up notices to him in the impugned inquiry. He said the petitioner made several requests to the bureau in writing to furnish him details of the complaint and allegations against him; however, nothing had been provided to him. The counsel said all assets and properties owned by the petitioner were declared in the tax documents. He asked the court to set aside the call-up notices and the inquiry being unlawful.
Senator Saleem Mandviwala apprised Bilawal of the issues in the Senate
Rabbani said the report of Faizabad Commission chose to close the matter while avoiding further controversy and...
He said political stability is a must for capitalizing on this rare opportunity in the form of Saudi Arabia’s...
At the moment, the foundation is managing 13 model emergency rooms across the country
The report states that due to importation of expensive wheat by government agencies, the national exchequer lost 31.32...
The fashion designer marked her attendance and assured the court that she would appear at each hearing of the case