PHC restrains Tesco from collecting surcharges
Fata industrial units
By our correspondents
July 29, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday restrained the Tribal Electric Supply Company (Tesco) from collecting tariff and financial cost surcharges in the monthly electricity bills of the industrial units in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
-
North West Raps About Piercings, Tattoos And Skipping School In New Song -
Teddi Mellencamp Shares Hopeful Health Update Amid Cancer Battle: 'Cloud Is Lifting' -
Prince William Makes Clear The Conditions He Has For Meeting Prince Harry -
Sara Foster Slams Age Gap Relationship After 'blah' George Clooney Date -
Jennifer Garner Recalls Enduring Ben Affleck’s Intense Beyoncé ‘Halo’ Phase -
Prince Harry’s Mental Health Ends Up At Stake As Meghan Moves Him To 'second Fiddle' -
Bradley Cooper On Who His Mother Thinks Is The World’s Best Actor -
Meghan Markle Offers Glimpse Into Intimate Dance Moment With Harry Amid Split Rumors -
Jon Bon Jovi Joins The Viral 2016 Throwback Trend With Nostalgic Photos -
Kate Middleton Hailed For Her Lack Of ‘obligation’ As Well As Altruistic, Selfless Qualities -
Jason Momoa Says Being With Beau Adria Arjona Feels 'perfect' -
Idris Elba Says One Mix-up Nearly Cost Him A Knighthood From King Charles -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Incurs Anger Of Biggest Royal -
Megan Fox, Machine Gun Kelly's Relationship 'is Just About Co-parenting' -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Warned They Can’t Fool Brits Because It Won’t Land -
South Korea’s Ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol, Sentenced To 5 Years In Prison: Key Details Explained