PHC stops Pesco from collecting two surcharges
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province. A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges
By our correspondents
July 25, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
-
Lewis Capaldi Sends Taylor Swift Sweet Message After 'Opalite' Video Role -
Sarah Ferguson Joins Andrew In ‘forcing’ Their Daughters Hand: ‘She Can Lose Everything’ -
'Bridgerton' Author Reveals If Actors Will Be Recast In Future Seasons -
50 Cent Super Bowl Ad Goes Viral -
'The Housemaid' Lifts Company's Profits: Here's How -
Michael Douglas Recalls Director's Harsh Words Over 'Wall Street' Performance -
Henry Czerny On Steve Martin Created Humor On 'Pink Panther' Set -
Lady Victoria Hervey: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Ex-girlfriend Proud Of Being On Epstein Files -
Huawei Could Revive Chip Technology If US Lets Guard Down, Intel CEO Says -
Dolly Parton Created One Of Her Iconic Tracks With Acrylic Nails? -
Parents Alarmed As Teens Form Emotional Bonds With AI Companion Chatbots -
Denzel Washington Surprises LeBron James -
Cillian Murphy's Hit Romantic Drama Exits Prime Video: Here's Why -
Paris Hilton Reveals What Keeps Her Going In Crazy Schedule -
Deep Freeze Returning To Northeastern United States This Weekend: 'Dangerous Conditions' -
Inside Dylan Efron's First 'awful' Date With Girlfriend Courtney King