PHC stops Pesco from collecting two surcharges
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province. A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges
By our correspondents
July 25, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
-
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court -
David, Victoria Beckham 'quietly' Consulting Advisers After Brooklyn Remarks: 'Weighing Every Move' -
Meta's New AI Team Delivered First Key Models -
Prince Harry Defends Friends In London Court -
AI May Replace Researchers Before Engineers Or Sales -
Christina Haack Goes On Romantic Getaway: See With Whom -
Consumers Spend More On AI And Utility Apps Than Mobile Games: Report -
Aircraft Tragedy: Missing Tourist Helicopter Found Near Japan Volcano Crater -
Taylor Swift Lands In Trouble After Blake Lively Texts Unsealed -
'Prince Harry Sees A Lot Of Himself In Brooklyn Beckham' -
Kate Middleton’s Cancer Journey Strengthens Her Commitment To Helping Children -
Gaten Matarazzo Compares 'Stranger Things' Ending To 'Lord Of The Rings' -
Prince Harry Slams Publisher Over 'dirty Trick' Ahead Of Showing Evidence -
Blueface Promises To Change Behaviour If His Ex Comes Back -
Prince Harry Makes Crucial Promise To Meghan Markle Over UK Return -
Keir Starmer’s China Visit: UK Follows Mark Carney In Major Reset Of Ties