PHC stops Pesco from collecting two surcharges
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province. A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges
By our correspondents
July 25, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
-
OpenAI Launches ChatGPT Translate To Rival Google Translate -
Top AI Themes Poised To Shape 2026: Here’s How -
Meghan Markle Accused Of Stealing 'bookmark' Idea -
Leonardo DiCaprio Changes His Stance On THIS To Remain 'his Handsome Self' -
Girl Dies After Years Of Alleged Starvation By Mother In West Virginia -
Here’s How Many Under-16 Social Media Accounts Were Removed In Australia -
Drew Barrymore Gets Candid About The Words That Haunted Her Childhood -
Why Fans Fell For Scammers Impersonating Reese Witherspoon -
'Stranger Things' Star David Harbour Opens Up About Manic Episodes -
Elon Musk Predicts That Solar Power Can Supply The Global Demand For All Of Humanity’s Energy -
Keith Urban Takes Extreme Measures To Not 'air Dirty Laundry' Post-Nicole Kidman Divorce -
Louis Tomlinson Reveals Hidden Anxiety -
Defying Age At Milano Cortina Games: Canadian Skater Stellato-Dudeke Aims For Gold At 42 -
Study Finds Screen Time Does Not Harm Teenagers’ Mental Health -
'Dunesday': What Robert Downey Jr. And Timothee Chalamet Really Think -
UK Regulator Reaffirms Ongoing Investigation Into X Deepfake Probe