SHC dismisses appeal of doctor’s convicted murderer against life term
The Sindh High Court on Friday dismissed the appeal of a convict against his life imprisonment sentence in a sectarian killing case.
Atif Nizami was sentenced to life imprisonment by an anti-terrorism court on December 18, 2011, after finding him guilty of killing a doctor, Syed Ibne Hasan, in August 2003 in Malir.
According to the prosecution, the defendant along with absconding co-accused Kamran killed Hasan and fled. The prosecution placed 16 witnesses, including two eyewitnesses, to prove the guilt of the defendant. The convict filed an appeal asking the court to set aside his conviction and acquitted him of charges.
A division bench headed by Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, after hearing the arguments of the counsel and perusal of the evidence of the case, observed that the prosecution had successfully established its case against the appellant through ocular account furnished by the eyewitnesses.
The court observed that appellant counsel failed to point out any material illegality or serious infirmity committed by the trial court while convicting the appellant. It upheld the sentence awarded to the appellant by the trial court and dismissed the appeal as it merited no consideration.
The court also dismissed appeals of three convicts against their life imprisonment in a kidnapping for ransom case. It however acquitted the woman co-appellant giving her the benefit of doubt.
Yasmeen, Asghar Ali, Fateh Mohammad and Dilbar Hussain were sentenced to life in prison by an anti-terrorism court on October 27, 2014, having found them guilty of kidnapping a boy, Mohammad Zahid, for ransom.
According to the prosecution, the appellants had kidnapped Zahid from Pak Colony when he was going to his shop in the Hyderi Market area and demanded Rs20 million for his release. The police however recovered the abductee during a raid on a house of the appellants in Ayub Goth and arrested them.
The counsel for the appellants submitted that police failed to produce any recovery from the appellants and no independent witness had been produced by the prosecution to prove the identification of the appellants.
The court observed that the prosecution proved its case against the appellants except Yasmeen. It dismissed the appeals of Asghar Ali, Fateh Mohammad and Dilbar Hussain and upheld their convictions. It, however, acquitted the woman and ordered her release if not required in other cases.
-
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters -
Candace Cameron Bure Says She’s Supporting Lori Loughlin After Separation From Mossimo Giannulli -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are ‘not Innocent’ In Epstein Drama -
Reese Witherspoon Goes 'boss' Mode On 'Legally Blonde' Prequel -
Chris Hemsworth And Elsa Pataky Open Up About Raising Their Three Children In Australia -
Record Set Straight On King Charles’ Reason For Financially Supporting Andrew And Not Harry -
Michael Douglas Breaks Silence On Jack Nicholson's Constant Teasing -
How Prince Edward Was ‘bullied’ By Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor -
'Kryptonite' Singer Brad Arnold Loses Battle With Cancer -
Gabourey Sidibe Gets Candid About Balancing Motherhood And Career -
Katherine Schwarzenegger Shares Sweet Detail From Early Romance Days With Chris Pratt -
Jennifer Hudson Gets Candid About Kelly Clarkson Calling It Day From Her Show -
Princess Diana, Sarah Ferguson Intense Rivalry Laid Bare