Public sector companies: CJP directs CEOs to return excessive salaries in three months
LAHORE: The Supreme Court directed the public sector companies’ chief executive officers to deposit the amount they received as big salaries to the National Accountability (NAB) within three months.
The court also directed the bureau to start recovery from those who were not willing to return their excessive salaries. A three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, heard a case about excessive salaries of chief executive officers (CEOs) and officers of public sector companies in the Punjab.
Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Ijazul Ahsan were other members of the bench. The court was informed that 39 out of 56 officers, who worked for the public sector companies in the past, or were currently working for them, had voluntarily agreed to return the salaries they received over and above their regular salaries as the government servants.
Representing at least 20 officers, advocate Ahsan Bhoon sought one-year time for return of the salaries in instalments. However, the chief justice declined to grant such a long time and observed that no money would be recovered after his retirement.
Chief Justice Nisar would retire in January 2019. The bench observed that NAB was free to drop inquiries against the officers if there was no other charge than receiving of excessive salaries against them.
The NAB authorities submitted a report about the companies’ officials, who had been drawing more than Rs300,000. The NAB prosecutor said that 58 officers got Rs520.074 million total from the companies. He said 34 officers offered to return the money voluntarily in instalments.
According to the NAB report, Ahad Khan Cheema got Rs50.14 million, while Mujahid Sher Dil got Rs20.41 million. The CJ remarked that more time could not be given for return of the money.
“Nobody will return a single penny after my retirement,” the CJ further remarked. He observed that the matter regarding the return of additional amount could be disposed of but whereas the matter of misuse of power is concerned, the NAB would look into it.
-
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’ -
Andrew’s Daughter Princess Eugenie Sparks Seismic Change After Stepping Away -
Meghan Markle Shares NEW Photos From Day Out At The Zoo -
'Game Of Thrones' New Series Returns To 'home' -
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Kanye West's Wife Bianca Censori Shows Off Hidden Talent -
Kate Middleton Has Learnt Her 'lesson' After 'powering Through' -
Will Prince Harry Be A Working Royal Again For Archie, Lilibet’s Royal Prospects? Expert Answers -
Chile In Danger: Deadly Wildfires Kill 20,forced 50,000 To Flee; President Declares ‘State Of Catastrophe’