close
Advertisement
Can't connect right now! retry

add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!

add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!
March 19, 2018
Advertisement

Constitution of Pakistan —Is a major overhaul needed?

National

March 19, 2018

Share

“In truth, laws are always useful to those with possessions and harmful to those who have nothing; from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all possess something and none has too much.” ? Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract

Famous French philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote that laws were to protect and promote the general will of the people whilst restricting harmful freedom for those with selfish desires. However, in the case of Pakistan, the legislation and execution seems overwhelmingly dominated by self-serving motives of the rulers to secure and prolong their rules.

On August 14th, 1947, Pakistan was carved out on the map of the world for the Muslims of India to live in peace and harmony, according to the principles of Islam; free to pursue all spiritual and worldly endeavors in a homeland of their own. Today in 2018, I look back at history of the last 45 years, trying to evaluate whether the famous 1973 Constitution provided the guidance for governance and progress or not.

By what I see is that we need to change course at the earliest as we are going down politically, economically, socially & morally. Should this constitution be given a major overhaul or should we start afresh? Is the present constitution serving the people of Pakistan or is it a tool for governing elite selectively apply rules to consolidate their hold on the power corridors & illiterate masses through a closed loop system of governance imposed by 1973 constitution, where we as public have one shot at elections, and are told to keep our ears, mouth and eyes shut for 5-years?

Let us not forget that in last 45 years since 1973, Pakistan People Party has ruled federal government for 4 terms, Pakistan Muslim League- Nawaz (incl. IJI) for 4 terms (including Zia’s period) and PMLQ- one term (under Musharraf). They all took oath to uphold the same constitution and yet not one government delivered what was stated in Article 37 and 38 that is the nutshell of what people would get from the

successive governments. There have been no roadmaps, no progress evaluation and no accountability. The governance system has failed to meet any goals, in fact every successive government has sunk the nation financially, making Pakistan amongst the most corrupt nations. Imagine there is no watchdog institute to judge the governance performance. What we have seen in 45 years is that every successive government not only lacked governance capabilities but interfered in the normal functioning of government to achieve their personal financial targets through misuse of offices. So much so that till today, there is no system to manage national calamities like floods, earthquakes, health-care or terrorists emergencies, even though we almost have then as an annual event. The same political forces always call upon one institution – the

Army for help, and yet malign it continuously otherwise. The Constitution is totally silent on what to do, when political stand-offs develop to create emergency situations. The only option given is vote-of-no-confidence, but the reality is that it is more applicable for an in-house change of the party leading Prime Minister or Chief Minister who already have a majority in the first place.

The 1973 Constitution replaced earlier governance documents, with the intent of creating a roadmap on national political independence, economic progress, social uplift and technology expansion in a framework of socialized society where the government will be responsible for every citizen, very clearly stated in Paragraph 37 & 38 of Constitution that says:

(a) Promote educational and economic interests of backward classes or areas;

(b) Remove illiteracy and provide free & compulsory secondary education within minimum possible period;

(c) Make technical and professional education available and higher education equallyaccessible to all on the basis of merit;

(d) Ensure inexpensive and expeditious justice;

(e) Make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work, ensuring

children and women are not employed in vocations unsuited to their age or sex, and

for maternity benefits for women in employment.

f) Enable the people of different areas, through education, training, agricultural and

industrial development and other methods, to participate fully in all forms of national

activities, including employment in the service of Pakistan;

Article 38, the core of the constitution, for developing a socialized state says: “The state shall provide basic necessities of life, such as food, clothing, housing, education and medical relief, for all such citizens, irrespective of sex, caste, creed or race, as are permanently or temporarily unable to earn their livelihood on account of infirmity, sickness or unemployment.”

But unfortunately, none of this has occurred.

As Nelson Mandela terms it, “Education is the most powerful weapon which one can use to change the world.” Let’s talk about the non-existent educational reforms. Article 25(A) under the 18th amendment of the constitution, inserted in 2010, reads:

“Right to education: The state shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 5 to 16 years in such manner as may be determined by law.” This is an important undertaking by the state since education, in contemporary times, is considered an important tool for enhancing one’s chances for socioeconomic development. However, we see no improvement in education anywhere as there is noimplementation. Another major implication of the 18th Amendment for education was that the curriculum, syllabus, planning, policy, centers of excellence and standards of education will fall under the purview of the provinces. Basically, the provinces do nothave the capacity or the financial resources to cope with the huge challenge in front of them. It has been argued that the contents of the curricula should remain with the federation since the provinces could take liberties, which may result in putting the unity and ideology of the country at risk. The question that raise here is how standards would be maintained across the provinces and how quality would be assured. The curriculum needs to be updated at the federal level. There needs to be one system of education for all provinces so that they can compete with each other – this being one of the many things that need to be done.

Also, the constitution does not allow anyone to head a political party if he/ she doesn’t fulfill article (62) and (63) of the constitution which says he is Sadiq and Ameen. Our ex-PM Nawaz Shareef conveniently passed an amendment in an act of the constitution, taking his lawmakers onboard and became President of his party, the PMLN. Eventually, the Supreme Court of Pakistan intervened and disqualified him.

Ideally, the constitution shouldn’t allow this sort of act, which is done for anyone’s self interests.

Law should facilitate the co-existence of freely living individuals, but Pakistan’s law usually attempts to sap the freedom and diminish any accountability of the rulers. President Ayub Khan through the 1962 constitution, Prime Minister Z.A. Bhutto through the 1973 constitution and the first 6 amendments, President Zia ul Haq through the 8th amendment, President Musharraf through the 17th amendment and

Prime minister Nawaz Sharif through the 13th amendment of the 1973 constitution attempted to increase their powers and lessen the accountability checks on them.

In my opinion, there is no overhaul of the constitution needed but it must be ensured that it is implemented in its true letter and spirit. The Supreme Court should act as a watchdog to prevent the constitution from being misused by our politicians for their self-interests. “..the constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions.”

—Daniel Webster

Advertisement

Comments

Advertisement

Topstory minus plus

Opinion minus plus

Newspost minus plus

Editorial minus plus

National minus plus

World minus plus

Sports minus plus

Business minus plus

Karachi minus plus

Lahore minus plus

Islamabad minus plus

Peshawar minus plus