Confusing questions
The NAB ordinance is not applicable to members of the armed forces (other than those who might be working or are posted outside the armed forces). Is this because the armed forces have, for some reason, a different standard of accountability from all other public officeholders? If this is correct – and while I am sure that the armed forces have excellent standards of ensuring accountability if there is any wrongdoing within the armed forces – is this not against the spirit of one set of laws for all citizens of Pakistan?
I also saw in Article 9(b) that all offences under the NAB Ordinance are of a non-bailable nature. Is this because the authors of the NAB ordinance took great care to ensure that punishments under the NAB ordinance should be as humane as possible? It would be great if these questions are answered by the competent authorities.
Sher Ali Khan (Mardan)
-
Cuba-Canada Travel Advisory Raises Concerns As Visitor Numbers Decline -
Anthropic Buys 'Super Bowl' Ads To Slam OpenAI’s ChatGPT Ad Strategy -
Prevent Cancer With These Simple Lifestyle Changes -
Air Canada Flight Diverted St John's With 368 Passengers After Onboard Incident -
Experts Reveal Keto Diet As Key To Treating Depression -
Inter Miami Vs Barcelona SC Recap As Messi Shines With Goal And Assist -
David Beckham Pays Tribute To Estranged Son Brooklyn Amid Ongoing Family Rift -
Jailton Almeida Speaks Out After UFC Controversy And Short Notice Fight Booking -
Extreme Cold Warning Issued As Blizzard Hits Southern Ontario Including Toronto -
Lana Del Rey Announces New Single Co-written With Husband Jeremy Dufrene -
Ukraine-Russia Talks Heat Up As Zelenskyy Warns Of US Pressure Before Elections -
Lil Nas X Spotted Buying Used Refrigerator After Backlash Over Nude Public Meltdown -
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters