Thumb impressions verification no valid reason to declare polls void
ISLAMABAD: While elections are being declared void because of Nadra’ technical stance that thumb impressions manually taken on paper could not be verified from authority’s database of digitally captured impressions in every case, Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) stated on Monday that during its pilot project in NA-19 by-elections, thumb
By our correspondents
August 25, 2015
ISLAMABAD: While elections are being declared void because of Nadra’ technical stance that thumb impressions manually taken on paper could not be verified from authority’s database of digitally captured impressions in every case, Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) stated on Monday that during its pilot project in NA-19 by-elections, thumb impressions of physically present persons could not verified in 54 percent cases from the digital biometric machines.
The disclosure has raised very serious questions on stance taken in judgment of NA-122 tribunal where Nadra’s plea that manually captured thumb impressions, no matter taken through magnetic ink or otherwise, could not be verified in majority of the cases.
Now ECP has disclosed that during its pilot project of biometric verification of voters at 30 polling stations of NA-19 by-election on August 16, 2015, a total of 15,723 voters asked to get them verified from biometric machines and only 7,233 voters were verified whereas even these digital machines failed to verify 8,490 physically present voters because of different reasons including bad quality of impressions on thumb. The logic is simple, if some impression could not be read by the machines directly, how print of these thumb impressions taken on paper could be readable and be matched with database record. All these voters were physically present there and knew their thumb impressions would be taken and obviously they were appearing in polling stations in presence of polling agents of all the political parties.
The major question remains which clause of law provides for a must verification of thumb impressions or making results of any such verification process a basis of declaring an election void.
According to top ECP officials and election experts, there is a need of great enhancement and improvement in the system, network and equipment before launch of biometric verification system in some constituencies. They say that even that will not be hundred percent workable and accurate idea and those voters not recognised by biometric machines will have to be allowed to vote after their “manual” verification.
The disclosure has raised very serious questions on stance taken in judgment of NA-122 tribunal where Nadra’s plea that manually captured thumb impressions, no matter taken through magnetic ink or otherwise, could not be verified in majority of the cases.
Now ECP has disclosed that during its pilot project of biometric verification of voters at 30 polling stations of NA-19 by-election on August 16, 2015, a total of 15,723 voters asked to get them verified from biometric machines and only 7,233 voters were verified whereas even these digital machines failed to verify 8,490 physically present voters because of different reasons including bad quality of impressions on thumb. The logic is simple, if some impression could not be read by the machines directly, how print of these thumb impressions taken on paper could be readable and be matched with database record. All these voters were physically present there and knew their thumb impressions would be taken and obviously they were appearing in polling stations in presence of polling agents of all the political parties.
The major question remains which clause of law provides for a must verification of thumb impressions or making results of any such verification process a basis of declaring an election void.
According to top ECP officials and election experts, there is a need of great enhancement and improvement in the system, network and equipment before launch of biometric verification system in some constituencies. They say that even that will not be hundred percent workable and accurate idea and those voters not recognised by biometric machines will have to be allowed to vote after their “manual” verification.
-
Nicole Kidman's Daughter Sunday Rose Under Intense Backlash Post-Keith Urban Divorce -
Teddi Mellencamp Reveals Medication Side-effects Landed Her In The Hospital -
Chase Stokes Calls Out Morgan Evans Over Comments On Kelsea Ballerini Split -
Elon Musk Says Legal Pressure Forced Him To Pay Full Price For Twitter -
Sarah Ferguson’s Downfall & Housing Crisis: Pals Make A Decision On Radioactive Ex-Duchess -
Taylor Swift Faces Awkward Situation Ahead Of Her Wedding To Travis Kelce -
Anthropic, Pentagon Resume Talks On ‘high Stakes’ AI Defense Deal -
OpenAI Annualized Revenue Hits $25 Billion Milestone Amid Global Adoption Surge -
Princesses Beatrice, Eugenie’s Parents Hurt Their Future With William, Kate: ‘The Knives Are Out’ -
Billy Porter Claims He Came Back From The Dead Amid Sepsis Battle -
Jason Dickinson Reportedly Headed To Oilers In Trade With Chicago Blackhawks -
Harry Styles Hints He's Ready For Marriage And Family Life -
David Harbour’s Ex Faced Extreme Humiliation At Lily Allen’s Producer's Birthday Bash -
China Targets Tech Innovations Amid High Stakes Rivalry With US: Key Strategies Explained -
Pacers Vs Clippers: Kawhi Leonard Powers Clippers Past Pacers For Third Straight Win -
Scientists Build Tiny AI Brain Model Using Monkey Neurone Data