Justice Mansoor questions legitimacy of existing benches
Three-member bench of apex court headed by Justice Mansoor was hearing tax-related case
ISLAMABAD: Senior puisne judge of the Supreme Court Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah on Monday questioned the constitutionality of existing benches till the formation of designated constitutional benches and remarked that if they themselves decide the constitutional cases then who is going to stop them?
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and comprising Justice Ayesha A Malik and Justice Aaqeel Ahmed Abbassi was hearing a tax-related case During the hearing, Justice Ayesha A Malik observed that the Constitutional Bench will hear this case adding that they are hearing a regular case. At this Justice Mansoor Ali Shah questioned that at present no constitutional bench has been constituted then what to do with this unconstitutional bench. Until the constitutional bench will not sit, are we unconstitutional”, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah questioned. The judge continued that it means that till the constitutional bench does not sit, the constitutional cases will not be heard. “Even if we hear this case, no one can ask us”, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked adding that questions are being raised about cases as to whether a case will be heard by a regular bench or constitutional bench. Justice Shah further questioned what would happen if they decide a case themselves and then who is going to stop them. If the review petition comes to us then we will say that we have jurisdiction to hear it”, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah remarked adding that constitutional cases cannot be heard by the regular bench and there is no support from lawyers either in this regard.
Can we hear this case or not”, Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbassi asked to which Justice Mansoor Ali Shah replied let’s see what happens. Justice Ayesha A. Malik however, observed that the decision will be taken by a three-member committee according to Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023, which will take time to decide whether the hearing will be held in a constitutional bench or a regular bench.
Meanwhile, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, addressing a lawyer of the parties, said that they could not give any opinion on his request, so they adjourned the case. We are just gossiping”, Justice Shah told the lawyer with a smile and adjourned the hearing for date-in-office.
-
Jennie Garth Reveals How She Got Her Spark Back Post Her Split From Peter Facinelli -
Jennie Garth Reflects On Dark Side Of Finding Fame At Young Age -
Dianna Russini Caught Off Guard On Instagram After Cheating Scandal With Mike Vrabel -
Kanye West Fans Get Good News After Shocking UK Ban -
Matthew Perry's Stepmother Slams 'heartless' Jasveen Sangha In Trial -
Blue Light Impact On Sleep Smaller Than Believed -
'Euphoria' Dominic Fike Opens Up About Transition As A New Dad -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s Demands From Netflix Reach A Fever Pitch: Insider Exposes It All -
Jason Momoa Escapes Death Once Again -
Think AI Will Replace Coders? New Data Says Otherwise -
Denise Richards Adopts New Approach As She Is No Longer Content With Staying In The Wings -
Sarah Ferguson’s Meeting With Andrew Ignite Something New & William, Charles Are ‘reassessing It All’ -
NASA Artemis II Astronauts Spot Meteorite Strikes On Moon During Flyby -
Tom Holland Spills On 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' Secret Reshoots -
Isla Fisher Backs UK's Kanye West Ban -
Why Delta Is Raising Bag Prices—What It Means For Your Travel Costs