Journalists’ bodies reject Pemra notification on covering courts
Notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary
ISLAMABAD: The Press Association of Supreme Court (PAS) and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA) on Wednesday rejected the notification of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) prohibiting TV channels for airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings.
Both the journalists bodies, covering proceedings of Supreme Court (SC) and high courts, demanded the regulator authority to withdraw its notification for being violation of articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
Meeting of PAS and IHCJA was held here jointly chaired by President PAS Aqeel Afzal. The meeting reviewed the notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary, declaring that the regulatory does not have the authority to prohibit reporting of court’s proceedings.
The meeting resolved that the articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution guarantee freedom of expression and public rights to have access to information hence the regulatory notification issued on May 21 is totally against these provisions of the Constitution. Both the journalists’ bodies demanded of the regulatory authority to immediately withdraw its notification and upon failure it would be challenged in the court of law. It is pertinent to mention here that Pemra the other day issued a notification whereby all satellite TV channel licenses in the genre of “News and Current Affairs” and “Regional Language” were directed that no content, including commentary, opinions or suggestions about the potential fate of such sub-judice matter which tends to prejudice the determination by a court, tribunal, etc, shall be aired.
Further, TV channels were directed to refrain from airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings and shall only report the written orders of court. The regulatory authority however, allowed the TV channels to report court’s proceedings which are broadcasted live.
-
Big Tech, AI Data Centers Driving US Power Bills To Record High -
Nicole Kidman Moves On With Wealthy Businessman -
Inside Taylor Swift’s Paranoia Towards Kanye West: ‘Security Had A Plan’ -
Trump Vows To Lift Turkey Sanctions, Considers F-35 Deal At NATO Summit -
Prince Harry Hurt, Accuses Court Of Going Extra Lengths To Save UK Tabloid: ‘Whitewash’ -
With No State-funded Security, Prince Harry’s Team Ensures Safe Exit Via Met Police Support -
Amazon Seeks To Raise $25 Billion Through Bond Sale: Report -
Prince William Kicks Back At Welsh School With Tiny Tots: Watch -
Dwayne Johnson Shares Beauty Hack He Thinks Every Guy Needs -
'Mama Bear' Anne Hathaway Offers Major Insights Into 'The Odyssey' Mom Role -
Princess Diana’s Brother Charles Spencer Drops Never-before-seen Family Snap Of Late Royal -
US President Mocked With ‘Trump Dance’ At FIFA World Cup -
Sandra Bullock Makes Heartfelt Confession About Nicole Kidman -
'Game Of Thrones' Star Reels From Pain After Mother Shocking Tragedy -
Reform’s Nigel Farage Resigns As MP Amid Funding Row, Vows To Contest Clacton By-election -
'Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender' Fast-tracks Release After Leak Fiasco