Journalists’ bodies reject Pemra notification on covering courts
Notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary
ISLAMABAD: The Press Association of Supreme Court (PAS) and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA) on Wednesday rejected the notification of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) prohibiting TV channels for airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings.
Both the journalists bodies, covering proceedings of Supreme Court (SC) and high courts, demanded the regulator authority to withdraw its notification for being violation of articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
Meeting of PAS and IHCJA was held here jointly chaired by President PAS Aqeel Afzal. The meeting reviewed the notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary, declaring that the regulatory does not have the authority to prohibit reporting of court’s proceedings.
The meeting resolved that the articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution guarantee freedom of expression and public rights to have access to information hence the regulatory notification issued on May 21 is totally against these provisions of the Constitution. Both the journalists’ bodies demanded of the regulatory authority to immediately withdraw its notification and upon failure it would be challenged in the court of law. It is pertinent to mention here that Pemra the other day issued a notification whereby all satellite TV channel licenses in the genre of “News and Current Affairs” and “Regional Language” were directed that no content, including commentary, opinions or suggestions about the potential fate of such sub-judice matter which tends to prejudice the determination by a court, tribunal, etc, shall be aired.
Further, TV channels were directed to refrain from airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings and shall only report the written orders of court. The regulatory authority however, allowed the TV channels to report court’s proceedings which are broadcasted live.
-
King Charles Leaning On ‘incredible Diplomat’ To Sort Family Issues -
'Power Ballad' Actor Paul Rudd Gushes Over Co-star Nick Jonas -
Anna Delvey Writing New Book Amid Ongoing Immigration Battle -
Harry Styles Receives Shocking Warning Over Zoe Kravitz Romance -
Mark Zuckerberg Reassures Employees, Says 'no Further Company-wide Layoffs' Expected This Year -
Netflix Drops Michael Jackson Docuseries Trailer As Biopic In Theatres: 'They Timed This One' -
Sheryl Crow Recalls Painful Breakup With Lance Armstrong Amid Cancer Treatment -
Mercury Reaches $5.2 Billion Valuation On AI Startup Push -
'The Boys' Creator Defends Series Amid Backlash: 'No TV Show Is Perfect' -
UK's NCA Issues Statement After £7m Cocaine Found In Kim Kardashian Brand Shipment -
Trump Mobile Accused Of Leaking Customers Data -
Ed Kelce Dragged Into Controversy Ahead Of Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Wedding -
UK Parliamentary Election Set For June 18 As Major Leadership Change Looms -
'Godfather' Star Andy Garcia Explains His Motivation Behind Long-delayed, New Project 'Diamond' -
King Charles Makes Emotional Visit To Newcastle Community Heroes -
Blake Lively And Ryan Reynolds Reported To Owe Millions