Journalists’ bodies reject Pemra notification on covering courts
Notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary
ISLAMABAD: The Press Association of Supreme Court (PAS) and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA) on Wednesday rejected the notification of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) prohibiting TV channels for airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings.
Both the journalists bodies, covering proceedings of Supreme Court (SC) and high courts, demanded the regulator authority to withdraw its notification for being violation of articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
Meeting of PAS and IHCJA was held here jointly chaired by President PAS Aqeel Afzal. The meeting reviewed the notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary, declaring that the regulatory does not have the authority to prohibit reporting of court’s proceedings.
The meeting resolved that the articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution guarantee freedom of expression and public rights to have access to information hence the regulatory notification issued on May 21 is totally against these provisions of the Constitution. Both the journalists’ bodies demanded of the regulatory authority to immediately withdraw its notification and upon failure it would be challenged in the court of law. It is pertinent to mention here that Pemra the other day issued a notification whereby all satellite TV channel licenses in the genre of “News and Current Affairs” and “Regional Language” were directed that no content, including commentary, opinions or suggestions about the potential fate of such sub-judice matter which tends to prejudice the determination by a court, tribunal, etc, shall be aired.
Further, TV channels were directed to refrain from airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings and shall only report the written orders of court. The regulatory authority however, allowed the TV channels to report court’s proceedings which are broadcasted live.
-
Henry McMaster Pushes New Congressional Map After Trump Pressure -
Ebola Returns To DR Congo, Africa CDC Confirms -
North America’s Busiest Commuter Rail System Faces Possible Shutdown -
New Hampshire Lawmakers Split Over Firearms On University Campuses -
Brazil Police Target Former Rio Governor And Refit Owner In Tax Probe -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Join Hands For New Project Amid Claims Of 'pressure On Marriage' -
Kate Middleton's Italy Trip Fails To Break Social Media 'curse' -
US Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks Resigns Amid Trump Immigration Shakeup -
Pete Davidson Slammed On Piers Morgan Show As He Splits From Elsie Hewitt -
1,700 Cruise Ship Passengers Quarantined In France Over Suspected Gastro Outbreak -
Khamenei Says Iran’s Resistance Has Strengthened Nation And Created Unity Amid Conflict -
New Study Reveals List Of World’s Most Hackable Passwords -
'Anxious' Prince Harry Holds Secret Meetings Amid Enormous Pressure On Marriage With Meghan Markle -
Warren Buffett And Stephen Curry Charity Lunch Sells For $9 Million -
Socialite From Prince William’s Circle Drops Bomb: ‘Meghan Didn’t Give Birth To Archie?’ -
Justice Clarence Thomas Says Threats Against Judges Are Growing, As He Seeks Security Funding