Journalists’ bodies reject Pemra notification on covering courts
Notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary
ISLAMABAD: The Press Association of Supreme Court (PAS) and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA) on Wednesday rejected the notification of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) prohibiting TV channels for airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings.
Both the journalists bodies, covering proceedings of Supreme Court (SC) and high courts, demanded the regulator authority to withdraw its notification for being violation of articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.
Meeting of PAS and IHCJA was held here jointly chaired by President PAS Aqeel Afzal. The meeting reviewed the notification issued by Pemra, issued on May 21 and termed the notification as against the freedom of press and independence of judiciary, declaring that the regulatory does not have the authority to prohibit reporting of court’s proceedings.
The meeting resolved that the articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution guarantee freedom of expression and public rights to have access to information hence the regulatory notification issued on May 21 is totally against these provisions of the Constitution. Both the journalists’ bodies demanded of the regulatory authority to immediately withdraw its notification and upon failure it would be challenged in the court of law. It is pertinent to mention here that Pemra the other day issued a notification whereby all satellite TV channel licenses in the genre of “News and Current Affairs” and “Regional Language” were directed that no content, including commentary, opinions or suggestions about the potential fate of such sub-judice matter which tends to prejudice the determination by a court, tribunal, etc, shall be aired.
Further, TV channels were directed to refrain from airing tickers/headlines with regard to court proceedings and shall only report the written orders of court. The regulatory authority however, allowed the TV channels to report court’s proceedings which are broadcasted live.
-
Think AI Will Replace Coders? New Data Says Otherwise -
Sarah Ferguson’s Meeting With Andrew Ignite Something New & William, Charles Are ‘reassessing It All’ -
NASA Artemis II Astronauts Spot Meteorite Strikes On Moon During Flyby -
Tom Holland Spills On 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' Secret Reshoots -
Isla Fisher Backs UK's Kanye West Ban -
Why Delta Is Raising Bag Prices—What It Means For Your Travel Costs -
Alibaba Launches Data Center With 10,000 Chips -
'The Office' Mindy Kaling Shows Off 40lb Weight Loss In Light Blue Gown: Watch -
Meghan Markle Just Filed Australian Trademarks: Here’s What It Means -
Sarah Ferguson 'sobbing' As Andrew Relationship Quietly Drift Apart After Fall From Grace -
World-shaking Cyberattack Could Hit In 2026, Sam Altman Issues Dire Warning -
Ghost Murmur Explained: How CIA’s Secretive Device Tracked Heartbeat Of US Airman From Behind Enemy Lines -
Prince William Warned Royal Family About Andrew Years Ago -
Greece To Ban Under-15s From Social Media -
Breakthrough Drugs Could Finally Tackle Deadliest ‘undruggable’ Cancer Mutation -
Google Debuts AI-powered Eloquent Dictation App: What IOS Users Need To Know