Supreme Court allows ECP contempt proceedings against Imran, others
The apex court permitted the ECP to go ahead with the contempt proceedings against Imran Khan and other PTI leaders
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday permitted the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to go ahead with the contempt proceedings against former prime minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan and other party leaders.
A three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ayesha A Malik and Justice Athar Minallah heard the ECP s petition seeking transfer and consolidation of cases filed by the PTI with different high courts challenging its contempt notices.
The court observed that the high courts had not restrained the electoral body from taking action against Imran and other party leaders but from taking a disciplinary action. The court asked the counsel for the ECP to also examine the objections to the show-cause notices served upon the PTI leaders.
Sajeel Swati, counsel for the Election Commission, submitted that the Lahore High Court had restrained the commission from taking disciplinary action against Imran Khan, Fawad Chaudhry, Asad Umer and other leaders. Justice Ayesha A Malik observed that disciplinary action could only be taken once the contempt proceedings were over. The judge asked the ECP counsel as to how the respondents were proceeded against in the contempt proceedings.
The counsel replied that Section 10 of the Election Act 2017 authorised the ECP to proceed in contempt matters. The counsel said Imran Khan, Asad Umer and Fawad Chaudhry were not appearing in the contempt proceedings.
He requested the court to direct the respondents to ensure their presence before the ECP and also direct the high courts to conclude the cases at the earliest challenging the contempt notices. Meanwhile, the court disposed of the matter to its extent and allowed the ECP to continue with its proceedings in the matter as per the law and Constitution. The apex court also directed the high courts to decide the pending applications of the petitioners, challenging the ECP notices at the earliest.
-
Kathy Griffin Reveals Why She Was Banned From Jimmy Fallon's Show -
Prince Harry Smashes Something Precious To The Firm With A Hammer -
Australia Takes Amazon To Court Over Allegedly Unfair Contracts With Prime Subscribers -
5 Things To Know Before Reserving WhatsApp Username -
Miley Cyrus Reveals Full-circle Moment After Getting Official Barbie: 'Personal Dream Of Mine' -
Prince Harry Sparks Outrage: 'You're Testing Already Strained Patience To Its Limit!' -
Jermaine Jackson Gets Second Chance At Sexual Assault Case -
Who Is Melat Kiros? Democratic Socialist Defeats 15-term Incumbent In Colorado Primary -
Sara Foster Talks About Her Younger Stepmom For The First Time: 'I Look At Her As A Sister' -
Chris Brown Pays Hefty Compensation To Housekeeper Mauled By His Dog -
How Trump Earned More Than $1 Billion From Crypto After Returning To The White House: Report -
Brandon Lake Reveals Why He Tattooed 23 Names On His Leg Before Debut Album -
US Lifts Export Ban On Anthropic's Powerful Fable, Mythos AI Models -
June Diane Raphael Remembers James Van Der Beek In Heart-warming Tribute -
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce's Wedding Security To Cost Staggering Amount: Report -
'Vanderpump Rules' Alum James Kennedy Engaged To Pregnant Girlfriend Jordan Meyers