Tyrian White case: Islam wants people’s personal lives private, says IHC
ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday dismissed petition seeking disqualification of Prime Minister Imran Khan and said fine would be imposed on similar petition if receive in future.
Division bench of Islamabad High Court comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb resumed the hearing of the petition submitted by Hafiz Ehtesham, spokesperson of the Lal Masjid's Shuhada Foundation.
The petitioner Hafiz Ehtesham alleged that the prime minister did not reveal that he had a daughter ‘Tyrian’ in his nomination papers. “He lied about his daughter that’s why he is not Sadiq and Ameen.”
During hearing Justice Athar Minallah questioned the petitioner that had he read the Article 63 (H)?
Justice Athar further remarked that if he had checked Article 63(h) which deals with moral issues and said the first principle of Islam is to keep someone’s personal life private. Therefore, private matters of any person should not be brought in the court, the judge remarked.
To this petitioner Ehtesham argued in court Imran Khan is public office holder and therefore his personal matters could not be considered beyond scrutiny.
To this Justice Minallah remarked Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution, under which petitioner had sought PM Khan's disqualification. Article 63(1)(h) stipulates that a person convicted of a crime of "moral turpitude" and sentenced to jail for not less than two years can contest elections if five years have lapsed since his release.
The judge further remarked that in Islam, it has been said that one should attempt to brush other’s private matters under the carpet. To this petitioner argued that yes Islam has forbidden to discussed personal lives of other but it is also written in Article 62 (1)(d) that character of member National Assembly should be according to this.
To this justice Athar Minallah remarked that it’s mean we should expunge Article 63 (h). He remarked, “Such petitions are only wastage of time.”
Justice Minallah also warned the petitioner that if such requests were submitted in the future, the petitioner would be fined. PM Imran Khan counsel Dr Babar Awan was present in court. However he did not need to present his arguments, as the court discarded the petition while hearing the petitioner.
-
Sophie Turner Gets Candid About 'imposter Sydrome' Post 'GOT' -
When Nicola Peltz's Boyfriend Anwar Hadid Found Solace In Dua Lipa's Arms -
Claire Foy Reveals Rare Impact Of 'The Crown' Gig On Career -
Megan Thee Stallion Teases New Music On The Way -
Blonde Kate Stuns In Photos With Prince William During Rare Joint Engagement -
Kate Gosselin Reveals Horrowing Moment Thief Nearly Took Her Down -
Billy Bob Thornton Weighs In On Contrast To 'Landman' Role -
Amanda Holden May Swap Position To Different Reality Show: See Which -
The Truth Behind Victoria Beckham's 'inappropriate' Wedding Dance Video -
AI Startup Raises $480 Million At $4.5 Billion Valuation In Earlier Gains -
North Carolina Woman Accused Of Serving Victims With Poisoned Drinks -
Robert Redford’s Daughter Amy Sings Praises Of Late Father -
OpenAI And ServiceNow Team Up To Embed ChatGPT In Business Workflows -
Johnny Depp Prepares For His Massive Comeback After Years Of Struggle -
Meghan Markle Is Ready To Put A Cork In It All By Giving Prince Harry Baby No. 3: ‘She Wants A Break’ -
Billie Eilish Speaks Out Against Authority: 'It's Very Strange'