Changing scenario in Afghanistan: PPP seeks clear foreign policy for peace, stability at home
ISLAMABAD: Parliamentary leader of the Pakistan people’s Party (PPP) in Senate and Chairperson Senate’s Foreign Affairs Committee Senator Sherry Rehman Tuesday said that Pakistan had the highest stakes in peace in Afghanistan, but the geo-politics of escalating violence next door indicates that peace may be much farther than imagined.
“In this scenario, clear, focused policy-making at home will have far-reaching consequences for the security, stability and economic health of the country,” she said while speaking to the reporters on the rapidly evolving situation in Afghanistan.
In her talk, Sherry Rehman said foreign policy cannot be predicated on mood-swing statements, or the personal likes or dislikes of any individual as it is pure statecraft which must reflect the institutional expression of state interests as well as the political will of the people of Pakistan. “Big decisions need big leaders who can sublimate their ego to public interests and institutional tradecraft, not just reach out to mass media via tweets and TV addresses,” she said.
Sherry Rehman said there should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that this issue will impact Pakistan hard in more critical ways than one. “Clarity and consensus are needed for any foreign policy to be successful, especially if policy agendas are focused on protecting a country’s interests and people, which involves managing competing interests and ideas. Why should Pakistan be different?” she asked, saying that “in times of crisis, leadership is crucial to policy formation as well as its smart articulation.
Unfortunately, she said at key inflection points for the country, the prime minister, who should have the convening power, and accompanying goodwill, to craft unity and consensus via political parties and parliament is absent.” It’s as if he feels he can outsource vital decisions that will test Pakistan, to other cabinet members and the security community, who should not have to go it alone when trying to chart a way forward for the country in the institutional vacuum he has created in Pakistan,” she said.
She said in war or peace, a country needs a leader who can speak with moderation and intellectual integrity with parliament in order to manage crisis or create new paths for development. She said Pakistan seemed rudderless at the moment, with the prime minister only using his office to swing from one extreme position to another.
When asked what the PPP would do had it been in government, she said, we would have to reinvent no wheel. “We already have a framework in place through which the National Security Committee of both houses of parliament came into being as a result of consensus resolution to defeat violent extremism and terrorism in 2008,” she said. Sherry Rehman said this resolution was framed as an outcome of the joint session of parliament which took place after a series of bombings, including the attack on Hotel Marriot, and this very resolution authorised the National Security Committee of Parliament to continue meetings, briefings, deliberations and decision-making which reflected the shared stakes of all parliament, which represents all of Pakistan.
She said when confronted with a difficult policy choice, for instance of what to do with existing American bases leased out covertly in 2001, this committee was able to draft a joint agreement for Pakistan to go forward with closing bases but opening the ground lines of communication for NATO forces bringing equipment and arms out of Afghanistan, not allowing any into the country via Pakistan’s air or ground space. “Because we were able to use our government’s convening power and across-the-aisle goodwill in Parliament, with all key ministries and ex-president Asif Ali Zardari and former premier Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani playing key roles in tandem with other offices, the agreements were publicly acceptable in Pakistan, they were also accepted by the US and NATO entities as consensus agreements,” she said.
She said as Pakistan faces one of the worst emerging regional situations in decades, the first test of its foreign policy is to not lock itself into policy straitjackets, but to be able to navigate a fine balance between friends and frenemies.
-
Pamela Anderson, David Hasselhoff's Return To Reimagined Version Of 'Baywatch' Confirmed By Star -
Willie Colón, Salsa Legend, Dies At 75 -
Prince Edward Praised After Andrew's Arrest: 'Scandal-free Brother' -
Shawn Levy Recalls Learning Key Comedy Tactic In 'The Pink Panther' -
King Charles Fears More Trouble As Monarchy Faces Growing Pressure -
Inside Channing Tatum's Red Carpet Return After Shoulder Surgery -
Ryan Coogler Brands 'When Harry Met Sally' His Most Favourite Rom Com While Discussing Love For Verstality -
Sarah Pidgeon Explains Key To Portraying Carolyn Bessette Kennedy -
Justin Bieber Rocked The World With Bold Move 15 Years Ago -
Sam Levinson Wins Hearts With Huge Donation To Eric Dane GoFundMe -
Kate Middleton Steps Out First Time Since Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Arrest -
Inside Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi's 'private' Marriage With Husband Jionni LaValle Amid Health Scare -
Germany’s Ruling Coalition Backs Social Media Ban For Children Under 14 -
Meghan Markle Shuts Down Harry’s Hopes Of Reconnecting With ‘disgraced’ Uncle -
Liza Minnelli Alleges She Was Ordered To Use Wheelchair At 2022 Academy Awards -
Quinton Aaron Reveals Why He Does Not Want To Speak To Wife Margarita Ever Again