French constitutional authority blocks online hate law
PARIS: France’s highest constitutional authority on Thursday ruled that it objected to a key part of new legislation that aims to fight hatred online but has also sparked controversy among critics as harming civil liberties.
The Constitutional Council ruled that certain new obligations for internet platforms set out in the law -- passed by parliament in May -- were harmful to freedom of expression and communication.
Lawmakers will now have to agree changes to the law before it is submitted to President Emmanuel Macron for signing. The Council ruled that certain parts of the law could "encourage operators of online platforms to withdraw content... whether or not it (the content) is manifestly illegal."
It said that a 24-hour period to withdraw material or face a penalty was "particularly short". "The legislature has infringed freedom of expression and communication in a way which is not adapted, necessary or proportionate to the stated aim," it added.
The law obliges platforms and search engines to remove offensive content -- incitement to hate or violence and racist or religious bigotry -- within 24 hours or risk a fine of up to 1.25 million euros ($1.35 million).
An extension of Macron’s vow to battle racism and anti-Semitism propagated via the internet, the bill was first submitted to parliament over a year ago.
It has since been amended several times in response to criticism and comments, including from the European Commission which demanded a clearer definition of what kind of content would be criminalised.
It has drawn criticism from watchdog bodies in France that have expressed concerns over potential violations of the right to freely express oneself on the world wide web.
And digital companies are worried about fines or legal battles that may result from the new onus placed on them to determine what content violates the bill, and then withdraw it within the given timeframe.
The French right had staunchly opposed the law and used its control of the upper house Senate to register its objections while the legislation was going through parliament.
"Only the title of the law appears to have been deemed constitutional," Bruno Retailleau, the head of the right-wing The Republicans party in the Senate wrote with heavy sarcasm on Twitter. "All those who care about freedom must celebrate this," he said.
-
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein -
Jessie J Addresses Pregnancy Rumors After Sporting Belly Bump -
Channing Tatum Leaves Fans Scratching Their Heads With Message About South Korea -
Emma Roberts Stars In 'A Body In The Woods' -
'Our Estrangements Can Kill Us': Meghan's Co-star Weighs In On Anthony Hopkins Interview