Thirty US senators support Iran N-deal
WASHINGTON: Another US Democratic senator said on Friday he would support the US-led nuclear agreement with Iran, moving President Barack Obama a step closer to having sufficient backing to ensure the deal stands.Tom Carper backed the deal negotiated by the United States and other world powers that would put new
By our correspondents
August 29, 2015
WASHINGTON: Another US Democratic senator said on Friday he would support the US-led nuclear agreement with Iran, moving President Barack Obama a step closer to having sufficient backing to ensure the deal stands.
Tom Carper backed the deal negotiated by the United States and other world powers that would put new limits on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for eased economic sanctions.
Obama is trying to muster 34 votes in the Senate to ensure lawmakers cannot kill the deal. Thirty senators, all Democrats and independents who vote with Democrats, have now said they will support it.
Congress must vote on the deal by Sept 17. The following describes how votes are likely to play out: When Congress returns on Sept 8 from its August recess, debate will begin on a Republican-sponsored “resolution of disapproval” against the deal. In the Senate, Republicans must gather 60 votes to move the resolution forward under Senate procedural rules.
If they can, they will then need a simple majority of 51 votes in the chamber to approve the resolution. It would pass, because Republicans control a majority of Senate seats and most have already come out against the agreement.
There is no similar procedural barrier in the House.
The resolution is expected to easily win approval there. Republicans hold 246 seats in the 435-seat House. If both chambers approve the resolution, it would go to Obama’s desk for review. He has vowed to veto it.
If he does so, opponents would then try to override the veto. This would take a two-thirds majority vote in each chamber. The Senate has 100 members; the House, 434, plus one vacant seat. Democrats could block an override in the Senate with 34 votes.
In the House, if Republicans voted unanimously against the deal, they would need to get at least 44 Democrats to vote with them to override a veto.
The Iran deal is not a treaty, so it does not need the two-thirds vote in the Senate to be ratified.
The “resolution of disapproval” mechanism was included in a law Obama signed in May giving Congress the right to weigh in on the nuclear deal with Iran.
Tom Carper backed the deal negotiated by the United States and other world powers that would put new limits on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for eased economic sanctions.
Obama is trying to muster 34 votes in the Senate to ensure lawmakers cannot kill the deal. Thirty senators, all Democrats and independents who vote with Democrats, have now said they will support it.
Congress must vote on the deal by Sept 17. The following describes how votes are likely to play out: When Congress returns on Sept 8 from its August recess, debate will begin on a Republican-sponsored “resolution of disapproval” against the deal. In the Senate, Republicans must gather 60 votes to move the resolution forward under Senate procedural rules.
If they can, they will then need a simple majority of 51 votes in the chamber to approve the resolution. It would pass, because Republicans control a majority of Senate seats and most have already come out against the agreement.
There is no similar procedural barrier in the House.
The resolution is expected to easily win approval there. Republicans hold 246 seats in the 435-seat House. If both chambers approve the resolution, it would go to Obama’s desk for review. He has vowed to veto it.
If he does so, opponents would then try to override the veto. This would take a two-thirds majority vote in each chamber. The Senate has 100 members; the House, 434, plus one vacant seat. Democrats could block an override in the Senate with 34 votes.
In the House, if Republicans voted unanimously against the deal, they would need to get at least 44 Democrats to vote with them to override a veto.
The Iran deal is not a treaty, so it does not need the two-thirds vote in the Senate to be ratified.
The “resolution of disapproval” mechanism was included in a law Obama signed in May giving Congress the right to weigh in on the nuclear deal with Iran.
-
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein -
Miranda Kerr Shares The One Wellness Practice She Does With Her Kids -
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15 -
Khloe Kardashian Shares How She And Her Sisters Handle Money Between Themselves -
Prince William Ready To End 'shielding' Of ‘disgraced’ Andrew Amid Epstein Scandal -
Chris Hemsworth Hailed By Halle Berry For Sweet Gesture -
Blac Chyna Reveals Her New Approach To Love, Healing After Recent Heartbreak -
Royal Family's Approach To Deal With Andrew Finally Revealed