Child rape case: S Koreans call for judge to be sacked
SEOUL: More than 100,000 South Koreans are demanding the dismissal of a judge who reduced the prison sentence of a child rapist to three years.
Lee, identified only by his surname, was jailed in November for eight years for raping a 10-year-old child after making her drink an alcoholic beverage at his house in 2018.
The 35-year-old, who runs a private tutoring company, claimed the sex was "consensual" and that he believed the victim was much older than South Korea’s age of consent, which is 13.
Last week, Seoul high court judge Han Kyu-hyun reduced the sentence to three years, saying there was "insufficient evidence" -- other than the child’s testimony -- that Lee assaulted her.
Women’s rights activists and the public protested the verdict, saying child victims of sexual violence were not being protected.
"The victim was a 10-year-old, and it seems like the appeals court treated the case as if she were an adult," said Chun Jung-ah, a lawyer who has represented many victims of sexual assault.
By Thursday more than 115,000 South Koreans signed the online petition calling for Han to be dismissed.
"Our judiciary is extremely lenient towards the sex offenders," the petition reads.
"This corrupt world -- where victims live in silence while perpetrators go on with their lives without shame, was possible because of judges like him."
Despite its economic and technological advances, South Korea remains a patriarchal society where victims of sexual assault have been shamed for coming forward.
In 2008, an eight-year-old girl was left disabled after being brutally raped and physically assaulted by a 57-year-old.
The man was given a reduced sentence of 12 years in prison -- rather than life -- because he was "drunk when he committed his crime", according to the court’s controversial ruling.
A number of proposals to raise the country’s age of consent to 16 have been submitted to the National Assembly, but none have been approved.
"Most lawmakers don’t pay much attention to this issue because 13-year-olds and 16-year-olds are not eligible to vote," said lawyer Chun.
-
New Guest Host Announced For The Kelly Clarkson Show -
Why Prince William’s Statement Over Jeffrey Epstein ‘says A Lot’ -
Paul McCrane Reveals Why Playing Jerks Became His Calling Card -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Thrashed For Their ‘bland’ Epstein Statement -
Bad Bunny Stunned Jennifer Grey So Much She Named Dog After Him -
Kim Kardashian's Plans With Lewis Hamilton After Super Bowl Meet-up -
Prince William Traumatised By ‘bizarre Image’ Uncle Andrew Has Brought For Royals -
David Thewlis Gets Candid About Remus Lupin Fans In 'Harry Potter' -
Cardi B And Stefon Diggs Spark Breakup Rumours After Super Bowl LX -
Alix Earle And Tom Brady’s Relationship Status Revealed After Cosy Super Bowl 2026 Outing -
Why King Charles Has ‘no Choice’ Over Andrew Problem -
Shamed Andrew Wants ‘grand Coffin’ Despite Tainting Nation -
Keke Palmer Reveals How Motherhood Prepared Her For 'The Burbs' Role -
King Charles Charms Crowds During Lancashire Tour -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew Still Has Power To Shake King Charles’ Reign: Expert -
Why Prince William Ground Breaking Saudi Tour Is Important