Screens of deception
The case of Dr Shahid Masood, on whose television show the Supreme Court has placed a three-month ban, illustrates to all of us the depth to which journalism, especially television journalism, has sunk in our country. As the SC bench headed by Justice Saqib Nisar noted, Masood had been guilty of contempt of court, inciting terror and violating regulations laid down for the media. We also know that the same anchorperson has committed the same offence over and over again. This is a sad state of affairs. So is the arrogant attitude of the anchorperson who tried to escape from the charges made against him by giving a verbal apology and insisting that he had intended no harm. This is hard to believe given that in the said show broadcast in January, Masood had put forward a string of lies regarding bank accounts owned by the murderer and rapist in the Zainab case, suggested he was linked to an international pornography ring and also claimed the involvement of people in government. No evidence was ever produced to back any of this; it is clear that many of our TV personalities project false and often maliciously intended news to millions of people across the country.
While there is no doubting that Masood deserved to be punished for his gross negligence, there are some questions about the direct ban placed by the SC on the show. Arguably, to set the right example, this should have happened through Pemra. In the past, Pemra has tried to impose bans on certain anchors, including Masood himself and others who are equally irresponsible – only for the courts to then issue stay orders against the bans. These stay orders stay in place indefinitely, effectively nullifying the ban. As it is, the electronic media is loosely regulated and when Pemra is defanged in this way it only encourages irresponsible conspiracy theories and allegations which have even resulted in endangering the lives of people. What is needed instead is for Pemra to be strengthened. The Supreme Court itself has too full a docket to hear every case of journalistic malfeasance. Empowering the body responsible for ensuring that our airwaves are not polluted with planted stories, anchors who incite violence and false reporting will be the most effective way of deterring any future Shahid Masoods.
-
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein