PHC stops subordinate court from trying defamation suit
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in
By our correspondents
June 27, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday suspended the order of trial court about dismissing an application of Qaumi Watan Party’s Member Provincial Assembly Bakht Baidar Khan to decide his defamation suit against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan on the basis of reply by defendant Imran Khan in the suit instead of recording evidence.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses. On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
A two-member bench comprising of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Musarrat Hilali also stopped the trial court of District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar from trial in the defamation suit till the decision of the court in the review petition.
The bench also issued notice to the PTI chief Imran Khan to submit reply in the review petition. The petitioner had sought decision on his defamation suit against him on the basis of replies submitted in the court by Imran Khan and the petitioner instead of recording evidence and examination of witnesses. On April 7, the District and Sessions Judge, Peshawar had dismissed the application of QWP MPA, who wanted the court to decide his defamation suit against Imran Khan on the basis of replies.
The petitioner’s lawyer Mazullah Barkandi submitted that the PTI chief had admitted in his reply before the trial court that his statement about allegations of corruption against the petitioner in the media is true and was made publicly.
-
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein