SHC dismisses petitions against LG law tweaks for mayor’s election
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday dismissed identical petitions that challenged the amendments to the local government law, which allow unelected individuals to contest elections for the posts of mayor and deputy mayor.
The Jamaat-e-Islami’s candidate for mayor, Hafiz Naeemur Rehman, had filed a petition with the SHC against the amendments that permit unelected individuals to contest the mayoral election.
His counsel pointed out that Section 18 of the law made membership of the corporation or council an essential condition for the eligibility of a person seeking to be elected to the post of chairman or mayor.
He said that prior to the 2023 law, it had been necessary for a person to undergo a direct electoral process to become eligible to contest the election for either of those posts. He also argued that the insertion of Section 18-B in the 2023 law effectively removed this requirement, allowing any person to be elected.
He contended that Section 3 of the 2023 law thus violated the fundamental principle of representative democracy at LG level, which is based on the vesting of executive authority in elected representatives of the people, as enshrined in Article 140-A of the constitution.
The Sindh government however raised objections regarding the petitioner’s locus standi (right to bring legal action) and the maintainability of the petition. The provincial law officer argued that the petitioner belongs to a political party whose elected representatives in the PA had voted in favour of the 2023 law, which, according to him, had been passed unanimously. He pointed out that the 2023 law was passed by the PA on May 11 and had received the governor’s assent the same day; it was subsequently published in the Sindh government Gazette on May 12.
The counsel for the Karachi mayor also defended the amendments and said the elected union council chairman can elect the mayor and there was no illegality in the amendments. A high court division bench headed by Chief Justice Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui, for reasons to be recorded later on, dismissed the petitions.
-
Why Royal Lodge Fell Into Disarray Under Andrew: Insider Exposes Loophole -
Hoda Kotb 'so Proud' As Today 'magic Reignites' With Sheinelle Jones -
Kate Middleton Avoids Nanny Involvmenet In Prince George Matters -
Colin Jost Jokes About Scarlett Johansson Losing Highest-grossing Actor Crown To Zoe Saldana -
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’ -
Andrew’s Daughter Princess Eugenie Sparks Seismic Change After Stepping Away -
Meghan Markle Shares NEW Photos From Day Out At The Zoo -
'Game Of Thrones' New Series Returns To 'home' -
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos